Waging, Defending and Covering Up Bio-Chemical Warfare...

JB Stone's online archive for bio-chemical warfare research.

Waging, Defending and Covering Up Bio-Chemical Warfare...

Postby J.B. Stone » 09/ 27/ 03 6:57 pm

MANY METHODS OF ATTACK, DEFENSE, RECOVERY AND STEALTH HAVE BEEN DIVISED FOR BIO-CHEMICAL WARFARE WEAPONS USAGE.

THE FOLLOWING ARE JUST A FEW OF THE BETTER-KNOWN PLOYS:

Biological and Chemical Terrorism: Strategic Plan for Preparedness and Response Recommendations of the CDC Strategic Planning Workgroup

Summary

The U.S. national civilian vulnerability to the deliberate use of biological and chemical agents has been highlighted by recognition of substantial biological weapons development programs and arsenals in foreign countries, attempts to acquire or possess biological agents by militants, and high-profile terrorist attacks. Evaluation of this vulnerability has focused on the role public health will have detecting and managing the probable covert biological terrorist incident with the realization that the U.S. local, state, and federal infrastructure is already strained as a result of other important public health problems. In partnership with representatives for local and state health departments, other federal agencies, and medical and public health professional associations, CDC has developed a strategic plan to address the deliberate dissemination of biological or chemical agents.

The plan contains recommendations to reduce U.S. vulnerability to biological and chemical terrorism --- preparedness planning, detection and surveillance, laboratory analysis, emergency response, and communication systems. Training and research are integral components for achieving these recommendations. Success of the plan hinges on strengthening the relationships between medical and public health professionals and on building new partner-ships with emergency management, the military, and law enforcement professionals.

http://www3.uakron.edu/ander/Bioterrorgov.htm

Bioterrorism In The United States: Threat, Preparedness, And Response

CBACI Project Team

Over the last several years, a confluence of events – the World Trade Center bombing, the Tokyo subway sarin gas attack by the Aum Shinrikyo, and the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City – focused attention on the growing threat of terrorist use of chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) weapons in theUnited States.

These developments gave rise to a set of perceptions – among policy makers and the public alike – that the United States is vulnerable to terrorist attack; that such attacks could entail the use of CBRN weapons; and that the United States has not been well prepared to deal effectively with such a challenge. Biological terrorism differs from other types of CBRN terrorism in that it would impose particularly heavy demands on the nation’s public health and health care systems.

Although a chemical attack would also tax these systems, bioterrorism would impose especially stressful burdens. Yet, that same public health system is the crucial factor in an effective response. A highly effective public health system should make an important contribution to deterring the threat by demonstrably diminishing the gains of a potential attack. It also constitutes the “first line of defense” in the event deterrence or prevention fails.

Ultimately, it will be the public health system that will be called on to mitigate and ameliorate the consequences of a terrorist attack using biological weapons.



A number of programs are underway to improve the health and medical dimensions of the national response to the threat of bioterrorism. Uncertainty exists, however, as to whether current programs are those that are most needed or whether they are being implemented in the most effective way possible.

This uncertainty exists because to date there have been insufficient means to judge the efficacy of existing programs. This lack of criteria is the product of not having an analytic framework that establishes national requirements for an effective response derived from a comprehensive threat assessment. The development and application of a strategic framework is urgently needed. Making a contribution to the development of that framework is the purpose of this project.
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Postby J.B. Stone » 09/ 27/ 03 7:12 pm

AND, WHEN YOUR OWN TESTING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS GO AWRY, YOU CAN ALWAYS CREATE CUSTOM MEDICAL "RESEARCH" DATA TO ALLAY FOLKS' FEARS. IT WON'T "CURE" ANYONE, BUT IT STOPS THEM FROM ASKING QUESTIONS, APPLYING FOR ASSISTANCE, AND ACQUIRING PROPER MEDICAL CARE.

THE COST OF DEVELOPING ANTIDOTES AND THE TIME INVOLVED BASICALLY PRECLUDE ANY FRUITFUL STUDY INTO THOSE AREAS.

FUNDING GOES TO BUILDING "BETTER" WEAPONS AND DISTRIBUTING THEM...NOT TO DEVELOPING PROTECTIONS AND ANTIDOTES...

UNLESS YOU CONSIDER THE TESTING OF EXPERIMENTAL VACCINATIONS ON HUMAN POPULATIONS TO BE A BENIGN MEDICAL PRACTICE...!!!

HERE IS A CASE IN POINT:


Long-Term Health Effects of Exposure to Sarin and Other Anticholinesterase Chemical Warfare Agents

Published On: March 20, 2003



During the period from 1955-1975, the U.S. Army conducted a series of experiments at Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland in which military volunteers were exposed to various kinds of substances, including chemical warfare agents such as sarin and other anticholinesterases. This is the second survey done to examine the adverse long-term effects of known exposure in the volunteers from the Edgewood experiments. In this current study, the Medical Follow-up Agency of the Institute of Medicine conducted a telephone survey of 4,022 military volunteers to compare the current health of those exposed to anticholinesterase agents with the health of men in two other control groups: those who had been exposed to other substances and those who had been exposed to no active agents. The telephone survey asked about general health, but was mostly focused on neurological and psychological health problems. This is because there is some evidence that exposure to pesticides-which chemically resemble anticholinesterase agents and thus might be expected to produce similar health effects from exposure-can cause neurological and psychological health problems.

In general, the study found few differences in health among the three groups of men. Experimental exposure to anticholinesterase agents was associated with significantly greater sleep problems and significantly fewer attention problems, depending on the control group with which the comparison was made. Statistically significant differences were not found in memory problems, peripheral neuropathy, vestibular dysfunction (i.e., dizziness), depression, generalized anxiety, somatization, or prevalence of birth defects.

The survey also asked about exposures to hazardous chemicals outside of the Edgewood experiments. Men who reported such exposure also reported significantly higher levels of problems in memory, attention, sleep disturbance, peripheral neuropathy, somatization, depression, generalized anxiety, vestibular dysfunction, and birth defects. These higher levels were independent of experimental exposure. However, they may be subject to reporting bias; i.e. because the non-experimental exposures were self-reported, there may be a tendency for those who recall hazardous chemical exposure to be more likely also to recall health problems. In this study, the health effects of experimental exposure were less frequently seen than the effects of non-experimental exposure.

This study was funded by Army grant DAMD17-99-1-9485 and appears in Military Medicine: International Journal of AMSUS, Volume 168(3): 239, March 2003.


As you can see, the process is quite simple. You define a "problem" group of Veterans and Civilian "Volunteers" who were exposed errantly, devise a questionaire or "poll" to produce the desired "statistics", disallow thinking outside the box, and declare yourself innocent BEFORE the test subjects [victims] have a chance to consult outside physicians with the necessary medical data. You further assure your success by keeping the test subjects' [victims] medical data "classified" for a sufficiently lengthy period of time [30 to 40 years or MORE] to allow for the deaths of many of the would-be complainants and thereby simplifying your "research data".

You simply IGNORE the survivors of the events, saying, "We can't find them"...[because we didn't LOOK for them]...and when someone is intelligent and sick enough to note connections between disparate exposures before and after the events, you easily cancel out their data, claiming that they are "imagining" the results.

It worked pretty well for "treating" the Gulf War I Veterans.

there may be a tendency for those who recall hazardous chemical exposure to be more likely also to recall health problems.


Any REASONABLE person would HAVE TO question the sheer AUDACITY of that statement...!!!

These are the results of being exposed to Sarin, Tabun, and/or VX Gas, all of which were possible in the Gulf and especially at the detonation of the ammo dump at Kamasiyah, Iraq at the end of Gulf War I.

excerpt from my guest opinion editorial in the Daily Inter Lake, 9-24-03:

From 1962 to 1973, the CIA, DOD, and Smithsonian Institution participated in Project 112/SHAD, during which more than 10,000 U.S. Servicemen became human test rats for the above-mentioned substances and more.

At: http://www.va.gov/SHAD/
http://deploymentlink.osd.mil/current_i ... ntro.shtml
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/macleod01strictly.html

You will confirm that the Americans who suffered these injuries and losses are treated exactly as described, documented by the Veterans Administration, Department of Defense, and Journal of the History of Biology.

Furthermore, of the 504,047 Gulf War I Veterans eligible for VA benefits, 149,094 (29%) are now considered disabled by the VA since the start of Gulf War I, many for illnesses due to Bio-Chemical and Depleted Uranium exposures in Iraq. More than 9,600 Gulf War I veterans have died. Please urge your Congressmen to resolve this impasse.



These problems will continue to persist until YOU speak up on behalf of your fellow citizens and DEMAND that they cease to exist.

Thank You Once More,

J.B. Stone, Human Test Rat
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Postby J.B. Stone » 09/ 27/ 03 7:43 pm

HERE'S THE OFFICIAL BRUSH-OFF OF CONCERN FOR VETERANS AND CIVILIANS EXPOSED TO SARIN GAS, JUST ONE OF MANY POSSIBILITIES IN BIO-CHEMICAL WARFARE, BUT A VERY LIKELY SUBSTANCE TO BE UTILIZED BECAUSE OF ITS EASE OF MANUFACTURE AND DISPERSAL...

Long-Term Health Effects of Exposure to Sarin and Cyclosarin are Uncertain

While DoD officials are trying to identify and contact individuals who may have been exposed to chemical weapons in Iraq, the long-term health consequences of such exposure remain uncertain. Investigations have not revealed information that deaths or injuries occurred among military personnel during the Persian Gulf War as a result of exposure to nerve agents. This preliminary conclusion is based on an ongoing review of health records, inspection of available medical logs of deployed units, and interviews with medical staff who were present in the Gulf and were alert for any sign of chemical casualities. The review is continuing.

Based on available research, if symptoms are to occur following an exposure, they appear with minutes to hours. Long-term effects have not been noted in scientific publications regarding individuals who did not have symptoms at the time of exposure. Furthermore, nerve agents have not been shown to cause birth defects or cancer.

Nerve agents may be delivered in gas or liquid form. The method of delivery is dependent on the type of munition (rocket, mine, bomb), capacity of the chemical container, and weather conditions (wind, temperature, and humidity). Nerve agents are designed to interfere with the function of the nervous system, and disrupt normal control of vital organ systems required to sustain life.

Sarin and Cyclosarin

Sarin/cyclosarin, odorless, colorless, organophosphate nerve agents are the chemical warfare agents that some U.S. troops may have been exposed to in the Gulf War theater of operations. Organophosphates are a common ingredient of insecticides used in homes, industry, and agriculture. Sarin/cyclosarin are much more lethal. If contact with sarin/cyclosarin occurs, several factors determine whether harmful effects will result. These factors include the level of exposure (how much), the duration of exposure (how long), and the method of exposure (inhalation or contact with the skin).

Exposure to a small amount of vapor from sarin or cyclosarin can cause dimness of vision, runny nose, chest tightness, and tearing of the eyes within minutes of exposure. Medium amounts of vapor can cause all of these symptoms plus eye pain, headache, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, sweating, forgetfulness, difficulty concentrating, irritability, depression, and changes in heart rate. As with low level exposure, the symptoms occur within minutes of exposure. The effects of low and medium exposure may persist from several days up to two weeks. Exposure to high amounts may lead to loss of muscle control, twitching, paralysis, unconsciousness, convulsions, coma, and death. The most common cause of death after acute exposure is respiratory arrest. Death may occur within minutes.

Even Mild Symptoms Indicate Need for Emergency Treatment

Sudden onset of other symptoms occurring immediately or within minutes of an exposure to even small amounts of a nerve agent include impaired vision, drooling, very severe flu-like symptoms, chest discomfort and uncontrolled sweating. Anyone experiencing even these milder symptoms would be expected to seek or require emergency medical treatment.

None of these symptoms is unique for nerve agent exposures, and may be associated with other medical conditions. Existing medical knowledge has not shown low level exposure (exposure without any symptoms at the time) to be followed by chronic symptoms.

Delayed or Long-Term Effects?

A recent scientific literature of nerve agent effects conducted by the Armed Forces Epidemiology Board, an advisory committee of independent, non-government scientists, suggested that even in humans who showed signs of acute toxicity or poisoning, long-term health effects are usually absent.

In 1988, the Centers for Disease Control concluded that nerve agents present little risk of either adverse health effects from long-term exposure to low doses or of delayed health effects from acute exposures.

National Research Council panels reached similar conclusions in 1982 and 1985 reports on possible long-term exposure to chemical warfare agents. While exposure to very low doses, which cause no acute signs would also be expected to be without delayed health effects, data in this area are very limited. More research needs to be done to confirm or disprove these conclusions based on experience from episodes of poisoning. VA will sponsor research to address the questions concerning the possibility of long-term health effects as a result of very low level nerve agent exposure.

http://www.appc1.va.gov/health/environ/12-96c.htm

~~~~~~~~

POTENTIAL EXPOSURE TO SARIN FROM THE DEMOLITIONS AT KHAMISIYAH, IRAQ ON MARCH 10, 1991

When rockets were destroyed in the pit area at Khamisiyah on March 10, 1991, the nerve agent sarin was released into the air. There have been no reports of injuries which required medical treatment related to nerve agent exposure. Medical personnel who were near Khamisiyah in March 1991 have been interviewed. They have said there was no evidence of health problems related to nerve agent exposure at the time.

There is a small area around Khamisiyah, in which the levels of sarin may have been high enough to cause mild symptoms, if there were any humans present. No units have been identified in this area.

The first noticeable health effect of low levels of sarin is pinpointing of the pupils of the eyes, which is called miosis. Also, at about the same low levels of sarin, there are other mild symptoms, including runny nose, tightness of the chest, and eye pain. After the exposure stops, these temporary health effects go away. Humans exposed to sarin begin to show these mild health effects, at levels which are about 100 times lower than the levels of sarin which could be fatal.

There have been no reports of troops who were treated for miosis related to nerve agent exposure. The troops who were around Khamisiyah on March 10, 1991, were too far away to develop these mild health effects.

Some troops may have been briefly exposed to very low levels of sarin, which were at a level called the general population limit. This exposure level would have been too low to activate chemical alarms or to cause any symptoms at the time. The general population limit was set at a very low level, so that even if a person was exposed to this level continuously for 72 hours, he or she would not develop any noticeable effects. This limit was set at 333,000 times lower than the level of sarin which can cause noticeable effects, such as pinpointing of the pupils of the eyes.

If a person was exposed to a very low level of sarin for a brief time, the current medical evidence indicates that long-term health effects are unlikely. However, the scientific evidence on the long-term effects is limited, therefore, the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs are committed to gaining a better understanding of the potential health effects of brief, low level nerve agent exposures. They have funded several research studies on the long-term effects of low level exposure at universities and medical schools.

http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/dugway/low_lv_chem.htm

~~~~~~~~~~

HOWEVER, THE ACCOUNTS OF EYE WITNESSES VERY GREATLY FROM THE "OFFICIAL" VERSION AND THE MILITARY MEDICAL COMMUNITY STILL PERSISTS IN REFUSING TO INVESTIGATE THE CAUSES AND UNDERLYING TRUTH OF LONG-TERM ILLNESSES CAUSED BY EVEN MINOR EXPOSURES TO THESE ELEMENTS:

Low doses of sarin may have long-term effects

Monday, December 23, 2002


Some veterans believe that soldiers on "clean-up" missions after the Gulf War may have been exposed to sarin nerve gas.


WASHINGTON (AP) -- Low levels of sarin nerve gas affected behavior and organ functions in laboratory animals at least a month after exposure, suggests new research that may provide clues to the mysterious illnesses of Persian Gulf War veterans.

In separate Army-sponsored studies, scientists observed behavioral problems, brain changes and immune system suppression in the animals many days after exposure to doses that caused no immediate effects, such as convulsions or pupil constriction.

Both studies involved rodents, and "that's a big leap to human beings," said Melinda Roberson, a behavioral neuroscientist involved in a study still under way.

Even so, the studies provide new information in an area where a lack of research has made it impossible to conclude whether Gulf veterans' illnesses are linked to low-level sarin gas exposure.

"They are pushing back the frontiers of biological effects of low levels of sarin. The evidence is building," said Dr. Francis O'Donnell, a medical consultant for the Defense Department who helps track Gulf War illness research.

Veterans of the 1991 war have suffered from various illnesses they believe linked to their service in the Gulf. Symptoms include chronic fatigue, diarrhea, migraines, dizziness, memory problems, loss of muscle control and loss of balance.

Most scientists have blamed stress. Some veterans attribute the health problems to toxic substances they encountered in the Gulf, including sarin, a toxic chemical weapon that is lethal at high levels. Others suggest it may be a combination of the factors.

The Pentagon has identified about 130,000 troops it believes were exposed to low levels of sarin in 1991 when U.S. forces destroyed a weapons depot at Khamisiyah in southern Iraq. Some veterans believe other sarin exposures occurred.

On its Web site, the Pentagon tells veterans that "current medical evidence indicates that long term health problems are not likely."

Dr. Robert Haley, an epidemiologist at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, has published almost two dozen studies suggesting that some Gulf War veterans' illnesses are linked to brain damage resulting from exposure to toxins such as sarin.

The Pentagon criticized those studies, in part because veterans Haley studied were not downwind of Khamisiyah when the depot was destroyed. Haley said the new research gives "biological plausibility" to his suggestion of a link to sarin gas exposure.

The study on guinea pigs is under way at the Army Medical Research Institute for Chemical Defense at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. Its preliminary findings were presented in November at the Society for Neuroscience's annual meeting in Washington.

In that study, guinea pigs were injected with nerve gas five days a week for two weeks. Some were injected with 20 percent of the dose required to kill half the animals and others with 40 percent of that dose.

Researcher Jim McDonough, a physiological psychologist, said that would be much higher than the level that the Pentagon says veterans were exposed to from the Khamisiyah depot destruction. Some veterans' groups question the accuracy of the Pentagon's exposure estimates, insisting they were much higher. Other researchers say there is no way to calculate the exposure levels for sure.

Although veterans were not injected with sarin, McDonough said the biochemical effects on the brain are the same for either exposure method. He likened the exposures to nicotine's effects on the brain whether the nicotine is smoked, chewed or delivered through a skin patch.

The exposed animals were examined after two hours, then at three days, 10 days, a month and 100 days. There were no changes in some physical signs the scientists monitored, such as weight gain and temperature.

But researchers said they found significant increases in certain behaviors.

For example, 100 days after exposure, animals in the 40 percent dose group spent significantly more time in the center of their activity chambers and traveled greater distances in the chambers, McDonough said. Guinea pigs in both dosage level groups also reared up on their hind legs significantly more often at 100 days.

Roberson said researchers saw a reduction in activity by the enzyme acetylcholinesterase, a key to controlling electrical impulses in the brain. She said that could affect behavior. Researchers are exposing another group of animals to verify the results.

Separately, researchers at Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute in Albuquerque, New Mexico, known for its tobacco studies, exposed mice to low-level doses of sarin in a three-part Army-funded study. The study, begun in 1998, was finished last year.

The mice inhaled sarin doses an hour a day for five days and an hour a day for 10 days. The levels were one-tenth and one-twentieth the concentrations required to kill a human. The mice were examined a day and a month after exposure.

Researchers found that the exposures, particularly when combined with heat stress, caused both decreases and increases in the numbers of receptor sites in areas of the brain critical for cognition and memory, "things that might be associated with Gulf War syndrome," said Rogene Henderson, Lovelace senior scientist.

Receptor sites are essentially docking stations for brain signals. In some cases the changes did not appear until a month after exposure, Henderson said.

Researchers found that the exposure also suppressed the immune system, the body's defense mechanism against infection and disease. Researcher Mohan Sopori, an immunologist, said that indicates something happened to the autonomic nervous system, which is responsible for the body's automatic functions such as sleeping and bowel movements.

http://home.att.net/~vet_updates/sarin-effects.htm


Image
Image
Image

I FIND IT QUITE FASCINATING THAT I EXHIBIT THE EXACT SYMPTOMS OF SARIN GAS EXPOSURE AND HAVE FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS...AND THAT THIS INFORMATION WAS IN, BUT THEN REMOVED FROM THE U.S. UNDERSECRETARY OF HEALTH'S "INFORMATION LETTERS" WHICH DELINEATE THE "PROJECT 112/SHAD PROTOCOL" FOR VA DISABILITY CLAIMS...!!!

AND THAT THEY DENY I EVER HAD ANY CONTACT, EVEN THOUGH I WAS "DISCHARGED FOR PHYSICAL DISABILITIES" WHICH ARE NOT DEFINED AND WHICH STATEMENT WAS HIDDEN FROM MY VIEW SINCE BEFORE I LEFT THE NAVY IN NOVEMBER, 1970....???

~~~~~~

PLEASE BE AWARE THAT SARIN, TABUN, ZYKLON-B, AND VX ARE DERIVATIVE OF INSECTICIDE EXPERIMENTATION AND ARE DESIGNED TO DESTROY THE AUTONOMOUS NERVOUS SYSTEM, CAUSING FATAL CONVULSIONS AND MUSCLE SPASMS:

Image

AND THAT THE RESULTS CAN GO ON FOR GENERATIONS:

Image
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Postby J.B. Stone » 09/ 27/ 03 7:53 pm

Sarin Exposure Linked to Brain Damage

Click Here to Add Comment Previous Current Articles Next

Subject: Sarin Exposure Linked to Brain Damage
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 16:51:26 -0500
From: Stephen Tvedten <steve@getipm.com>
Organization: Get Set Inc. (www.getipm.com)

To: Paul Helliker <phelliker@cdpr.ca.gov> Director, State of California, Department of Pesticide Regulation

cc: Christine Whitman whitman.christine@epa.gov

Sarin Exposure Linked to Brain Damage Debbie Funk Army Times http://www.armytimes.com

... New scientific research shows low-dose sarin chemical warfare agent exposure, without symptoms at the time of exposure, have long-term health effects; Gulf War veterans' fears confirmed ...

Repeated exposure to the nerve agent sarin at low doses may create lasting effects on the body's systems that influence behavior, according to a study presented at a recent scientific meeting.

In the study, conducted by the Army's chemical defense institute, guinea pigs given two-fifths of a lethal dose of sarin showed higher levels of activity 100 days after exposure compared to animals given a lower dose or no sarin at all.

Moreover, animals injected with sarin at either one-fifth or two-fifths the lethal dose rose on their hind legs more often than did guinea pigs receiving only saline shots.

The differences didn't appear until 100 days after injection. By then, the level of cholinesterase - an enzyme essential for turning off nerve impulses that make muscles contract, salivary glands excrete and other functions - had returned to normal. Sarin inhibits the enzyme and did so initially in the injection phase of the study.

"The results suggest that depression of cholinesterase activity following low-dose sarin exposure may lead to persistent neurochemical or pathological changes that influence behavior," according to an abstract of the study presented Nov. 3 at a meeting in Florida of the Society for Neuroscience.

This study is believed to be the first that has looked at the potential impact over this much time, a researcher said.

Researchers are trying to replicate their work with sarin to validate the findings. They also will test VX, a more persistent nerve agent. "We're trying to pin down whether this is a real effect or not," John McDonough, one of the researchers, said. "We did it very carefully but we want to be absolutely sure we're actually seeing something here."

The levels of nerve agent used in the experiments would trigger alarms in the field and likely cause immediate symptoms, such as a runny nose, in those exposed, said McDonough, a research psychologist at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense.

Researchers have been re-evaluating whether there are long-term health effects from exposure to low doses of nerve agent because little is known about it. Published studies didn't show strong evidence of serious and lasting health effects in cases where there were no acute symptoms at the time of exposure, McDonough said.

Dosage levels used in this experiment probably would cause acute symptoms if the nerve agent were vaporized, the expected delivery method on the battlefield. Pupils would constrict to the size of tiny dots, vision would dim and noses would run, McDonough said.

Guinea pigs were divided into three groups and received injections five days a week for two weeks. One group received only saline injections, another group was injected with one-fifth of the lethal dose of sarin, and the third group was injected with two-fifths of the lethal dose.

Because they were exposed to sarin through injection and not vapor, there were no acute symptoms from the nerve agent. But researchers were looking for the nerve agent's effect on the central nervous system, and theorized that at the dose levels used, they might see some long-term impact on behavior.

Scientists debate whether Desert Storm veterans were repeatedly exposed to low-levels of nerve agent as a possible explanation for some of their ailments, McDonough said.

Researchers at the chemical defense institute hope the study prompts further research. If they validate the results at this dose level, researchers will evaluate the potential impact of lower dose levels on the central nervous system.

Steve Robinson, executive director of the National Gulf War Resource Center, said the results show promise for Persian Gulf War veterans. The findings could help build the linkage needed for the Department of Veterans Affairs to presume illnesses are service-connected for veterans who were near Khamisiyah, Iraq, when a chemical weapons depot was destroyed there in 1991.

"It points in the direction of what has been the gut feeling in veterans all along, that exposures are causal factors in their illness," Robinson said.

Posted 12/19/2002 7:21:57 PM

http://www.veteransforcommonsense.org/a ... asp?id=209

Copyright material is distributed without profit or payment for research and educational purposes only, in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107. Reference: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Veterans for Common Sense is an ad-hoc organization of Gulf War veterans working to ensure the debate over war considers all necessary issues.

"ASK YOUR PEST CONTROL COMPANY OR STATE REGULATOR TO SHOW YOU ANYWHERE ON THE LABELS OF THE VARIOUS "REGISTERED PESTICIDE POISONS THEY USE AND/OR RECOMMEND WHERE IT STATES THIS POISON IS SAFE FOR HUMANS AND/OR PETS."

http://www.safe2use.com/ca-ipm/02-12-21f.htm


~~~~~~~
SEE ALSO:

http://www.idir.net/~krogers/encl5~1.html

~~~~~~


FROM: Gary Pitts

DATE: September 8, 2000

Re: Implications of the Institute of Medicine Report on the Litigation Against the Chemical & Biological Suppliers of Saddam



The Institute of Medicine released its 328-page book yesterday: Gulf War Health: Vol. 1 Depleted Uranium, Sarin, Pyridostigmine Bromide and Vaccines. It is a good synopsis. It was an assessment of the scientific literature concerning ?the compounds of most concern to the veterans.? They went through 10,000 abstracts and medical articles and 1,000 peer reviewed medical journal articles - ?all relevant toxicological, animal & human studies? on those compounds, at ?any dose? level.

They formed categories which essentially meant:

1.) Yes, that?s certainly it
2.) It probably did cause it
3.) Maybe it caused it
4.) We don?t know
5.) It probably did not cause it

Since the Gulf War Illness is a chronic long-standing multi-symptom illness, connections to transient acute local effects like redness and swelling at an inoculation site can be disregarded. Concerning long-term effect, there was only one compound that rose above "we don?t know"; that was exposure to Sarin sufficient to cause acute signs and symptoms. They held that studies of industrial workers exposed to Sarin in the U.S. and "Japanese civilians exposed to Sarin terrorist attacks" "had symptoms like our Gulf vets." In regard to low-level Sarin exposure, which is what the Gulf veterans had, they say ?we don?t know?; but within that categorization they made this powerful connection:

"On the basis of positive findings in studies of nonhuman primates and humans exposed to organophosphate insecticides, it is reasonable to hypothesize that long-term adverse health effects can occur after exposure to low levels of Sarin. Studies of industrial workers exposed to low levels of organophosphate insecticides consistently show a higher prevalence of neurological and/or psychiatric symptom reporting. However, there are no well-controlled studies of long term health effects in humans exposed to Sarin at doses that do not produce acute signs and symptoms".

Obviously, studies can?t be done on humans with Sarin nerve gas.



MEMO September 8, 2000 Page 2

The Institute of Medicine gave no such support to any other compound being connected to the kind of symptoms the veterans have.

Drs. Haley and Kurt?s research at U.T. Southwestern was given a lot of attention in the executive summary.

The IOM?s recommendations for further research funding are very favorable. They are picking up on Dr. Haley & Kurt?s research and finally getting very focused. Thet recommended research on:

1.) Studies in animals of long-term effects of short-term Sarin exposure lower than acute levels;

2.) Long-term follow up of the Japanese exposed to Sarin by terrorists;

3.) Research on genetic susceptibility to Sarin (Haley has done a medical journal article on his study showing this connection, and I have also found it to be true in my eight clients that I have had renetically tested.); and

4.) Chemical interactions between the P.B. pills and organophosphate chemicals (insecticides and Sarin are both organophosphates), and battlefield stress. [There is research that stress - such as facing the Iraqi bio/chem arsnel the Defendant?s supplied - allowed the chemicals to cross the blood brain barrier, thus allowing more damage by the chemical interactions going on there.] As the IOM and news commentators have pointed out, we will never be able to show exactly how much toxic compound each veteran was exposed to. We can prove wide=spread low-level exposure of the veterans to Sarin, however.

Metaphorically, the chemical horses are way ahead in this scientific horse race. There is not a scientific concenus of certainty yet, but if pressed to it today, it appears there is enough science to uphold a jury? verdict based on ?preponderance of the evidence.?

Gary Pitts

http://www.idir.net/~krogers/garymemo.html


AND, SEVERAL CLASS-ACTION LAW SUITS ARE UNDERWAY REGARDING GULF WAR I, PROJECT 112/SHAD VETERANS AND NUCLEAR VETERANS AT THIS TIME...
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Postby J.B. Stone » 09/ 27/ 03 8:09 pm

HERE IS JUST ONE EXAMPLE OF A TEST SERIES IN WHICH HUMANS WERE EXPOSED TO SARIN ON THE ISLAND OF HAWAII:

GREEN MIST
2-2-2-2 Test Name Green Mist (DTC Test 66-4) Testing Organization US Army Deseret Test Center Test Dates March 25 – April 24, 1967 Test Location Island of Hawaii Test Operations To determine the average dosage in a mountain rain forest of four chemical weapon systems employing the M139 sarin nerve agent bomblet. Participating Services Deseret Test Center Units and Ships Involved Not identified Dissemination Procedures M139 sarin nerve agent-filled bomblets were statically detonated at several heights below the canopy. Agents, Simulants, Tracers Sarin Nerve Agent Methylacetoacetate

Ancillary Testing Not identified Decontamination Not identified Potential Health Risks Associated with Agents, Simulants, Tracers Sarin Nerve Agent (GB) Sarin gas is a volatile and lethal nerve agent. It can enter the body by inhalation, ingestion, through the eyes, and to a lesser extent through the skin. After exposure to a sufficient dose, human symptoms may occur within minutes and include runny nose, watery eyes, difficulty breathing, dimness of vision, confu- sion, drowsiness, coma, and death. Very little information is available regarding long-term health effects following exposures to low levels that do not cause acute symptoms.

No information is available regarding potential carcinogenicity. An Institute of Medicine committee concluded that there was insufficient evidence for or against an association Page 3 The Department of Defense (DoD) is providing this information, at the request of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), to assist the VA in providing healthcare services to qualified veterans and to assist veterans in establishing service connection for disability claims. The Deployment Health Support Directorate (DHSD) collected this information from multiple sources and requested that the military services declassify it to allow its public distribution.

The VA accepts this information provided on location, dates, units and/or ships, and substances involved in this exercise, which DHSD extracted from classified DoD records, and will provide it to individual veterans as necessary, but the VA cannot verify its accuracy. GREEN MIST
3-3-3-3 between low-level sarin exposure and long-term health effects.


(Sources: http://www.bt.cdc.gov/Agent/Nerve/ Sarin/Sarin.asp [as of February 13, 2002]Institute of Medicine (National Academies), Gulf War and Health (vol.1): Depleted Uranium, Pyridostigmine Bromide, Sarin, Vaccines. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2000.)

Methylacetoacetate (MAA) This compound was used as a simulant. While acute exposure has been associated with irritation of skin, eyes, respiratory tract, and digestive tract, there is little or no evidence of long-term or late-developing health effects and it is not known to cause cancer in animal testing.
(Sources: NLM TOXNET, Methylacetoacetate
105-45-3, HSDB Human Health Effects and Animal Toxicity Studies, available at http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov.http://hazard.com/msds/ tox/f/q4/q936.html [as of January 28, 2002] and http://www.hbcollege/chem/lab/organic/gilbert3e/

MORE DETAILED INFORMATION HERE:

http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cache:DE ... n&ie=UTF-8

Very little information is available regarding long-term health effects following exposures to low levels that do not cause acute symptoms.


AND, THOSE CERTAINLY WOULD BE MIGHTY INCONVENIENT FINDINGS...

~~~~~~

March/April 2003



SHAD UPDATE: VVA Sues Accountable Federal Officials BY WILLIAM TRIPLETT

There's an old saying: If you don't like the system, change it. That's often followed by another old saying about how some things are easier said than done. Veterans have long complained of the slow, laborious, even labyrinthine process the Department of Veterans Affairs requires them to undergo in order to file a claim. The process is worse if access to classified military records is necessary to adjudicate a claim. And if those records involve military operations that are still secret or potentially embarrassing - or pose a huge financial liability to the government - you may have an easier time, per another old saying, getting blood from a stone.

Vietnam Veterans of America, 21 veterans of a still largely secret Department of Defense program, several senators, and a number of members of the House want to change the system - at least enough to eliminate the government's tendency to protect itself at the expense of veterans.

In the 1960s, the Pentagon carried out highly classified seaborne biological and chemical warfare tests that involved an estimated 5,000 to 10,000 U.S. Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force personnel. The tests were code-named SHAD, an acronym for Shipboard Hazard and Decontamination. The objective was to determine the vulnerability of American warships to chemical and biological warfare (CBW). SHAD veterans claim they were never informed of the testing, which exposed them to various CBW agents and toxins as well as decontaminants later discovered to be carcinogenic. Many veterans have developed - and some have died - from illnesses associated with exposure to those substances.

When SHAD veterans learned in the last decade that they had been part of a secret CBW test program, they tried to get information about it from the Pentagon to facilitate filing VA medical claims. After first denying that SHAD had ever taken place, then later admitting it had, Pentagon officials have been slow in providing information about the various tests. The officials maintain that the records - anywhere from 30 to 40 years old - are hard to find and must first be reviewed before declassification, all of which takes time, they say.

The veterans counter that the Pentagon has long known that the substances used were dangerous and should have been alerting veterans, through the VA, about what they had been exposed to. VVA and 21 SHAD veterans last fall filed a unique class-action suit they hope will change the way the Pentagon and the VA handle claims involving classified records - which, the plaintiffs believe, also will have implications for the way the two agencies handle all claims.

At the same time, Rep. Mike Thompson (D-Calif.) and Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) are planning to introduce legislation that would force the Department of Defense to submit to Congress a thorough review of all CBW testing the military has done. The legislation also would require the VA to notify veterans of their participation and to specify what substances they may have been exposed to - something the lawsuit alleges the VA has deliberately failed to do properly.

"The bill has quite a bit of bipartisan support," said Mandy Kenney, deputy legislative director for Thompson. "`It's a pretty pure cause: Folks who served their country deserve to have appropriate information on their medical history. We're not asking DoD to release national security secrets, just provide accurate information on what they were exposed to so they can get help if necessary."

Instead of suing the U.S. government at large, as is typically done, the class-action suit names specific employees, either current or former, of the Department of Defense and the VA. "That is very important in terms of legal strategy," said Douglas Rosinski, an attorney with Shaw Pittman, the Washington, D.C., law firm representing VVA and the 21 SHAD veterans. "This is explicitly not another lawsuit against the government. For one reason, lawsuits against the government are tough and the government is a big target. But more importantly, the `government' didn't decide to do project SHAD. The 'government' didn't decide not to tell anybody about it. These decisions were made by specific people. We've spent a lot of time picking out people we know did the things we say they did."

Pentagon officials named as defendants include former Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara, along with John C. Doesburg, Bernard D. Rostker, and Michael Kilpatrick. The VA officials named are Susan H. Mather, Neil S. Otchin, Robert J. Epley, and Thomas J. Pamperin. The suit alleges that these people orchestrated or contributed to a cover-up - characterized as "intentional, willful, wanton, and in bad faith" in the complaint - of SHAD and its possible adverse health effects by denying veterans access to information about the tests. "These are people who signed or stamped the letters and denials," Rosinski said.

The complaint holds that by not providing timely information to the veterans - the military knew as early as the mid-1980s that at least one substance used was emphatically not harmless, as originally believed - and by continuing to deny veterans access to the full information, the defendants violated the plaintiffs' constitutional right to go to court and file claims. It is by specifically naming defendants that the suit hopes to change things.

"You don't take on the whole bureaucracy," Rosinski said. "You don't take on city hall. You go in and kick out the bums who are in city hall. What we're saying is, 'Hey, you can't just sit there behind your desk and stamp "deny, deny, deny," because it makes your processing rate look good so that you can get promoted. You think you're doing better by protecting military secrets, and they may be secrets, but dammit, you know it means 5,000 veterans not getting their benefits because you "know better." We want you to think about what you've done, because you're going down for it.' "

Department of Justice attorneys, who will represent all defendants in the suit, recently responded to the complaint by filing a motion to dismiss the case. This is a standard tactic in lawsuits involving the government, which usually argues it is immune from such cases. Rosinski predicts that whatever the decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which is presiding over the case, it will be appealed. "I'm sure they will appeal if they lose" on the motion, he said, "and I know we will appeal if they win." The appeals process could take more than a year to resolve, he said. "We'll be lucky if the case actually gets started by next summer."

Then again, as another old saying goes, better late than never.

Shipboard Hazard and Decontamination (SHAD) was a small part of Project 112, which drew together all DoD chemical warfare agent testing, bio warfare agent tests, and all other nonconventional weaponry testing. This project involved the highest level of the U.S. government. All tests down to the minute details of who, what, when, how, and which agent would be involved was requested over the signature of Secretary Robert McNamara. The final decision was made by the president after significant input by the national security adviser and the president's science adviser. Results of each and every test came right back to the same officials. SHAD is the first set of tests for which we have been able to obtain documentation.

http://www.vva.org/TheVeteran/2003_03/shad_update.htm
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Postby J.B. Stone » 09/ 27/ 03 8:33 pm

PLEASE SEE THESE RELATED TOPIC THREADS FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION:

BIO-CHEMICAL WARFARE AND EXPERIMENTATION TIME LINE DATA:

http://www.freedominion.ca/phpBB2/viewt ... 651#131480


...THE HISTORY OF MILITARY AND TERRORIST USAGE OF BIO-CHEMICAL AGENTS AND DESCRIPTIONS OF BIO-CHEMICAL WARFARE IN OUR TIME

AND...

PLEASE SEE THE NEW PROJECT 112/SHAD INFORMATION AND LINKS PROVIDED HERE:

http://www.freedominion.ca/phpBB2/viewt ... d=b59357ab

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING THE U.S. MILITARY EXPERIMENTS AND TESTS WITH HUMAN SUBJECTS...


THANK YOU...!!!
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Postby J.B. Stone » 09/ 27/ 03 10:59 pm

THE MEANS OF DELIVERY OF BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS NEED NOT BE VERY SOPHISTICATED, COSTLY, NOR COMPLEX...

Bioterror fears go beyond anthrax
By SETH MULLER
Sun Staff Reporter
09/11/2003

http://www.azdailysun.com/non_sec/nav_i ... ryID=72848


If a dozen terrorists infected themselves with the smallpox virus, waited to become contagious, and boarded a subway in New York, they could infect as many as 1,000 people in a few short rides.

And those 1,000 people could infect the entire world population in 180 days. This with a virus that has at least a 30 percent mortality rate and leaves its survivors disfigured, mentally deficient and sometimes deaf or blind.

That's what Northern Arizona University biochemistry professor Paul Torrence calls a worst-case bioterrorism scenario. There's also a number of other scenarios that are not good, either.

"We are open to a variety of threats," Torrence said of bioterrorism. "You could never defend against all of the possibilities."

Earlier this year, Torrence and his colleague Edgar Civitello received a $500,000 grant from the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases to find a new drug to treat smallpox. They're also trying to develop a drug to fight complications of the vaccine, which, in rare cases, can cause death.

They represent one of several research teams working to discover a way to counter the deadly virus.

The importance of their work becomes all too apparent on the second anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

When it comes to bioterrorism, Torrence said there is no greater threat than smallpox. It's worse than anthrax and worse than all other infectious diseases.

Babb Financial Group
This is because the virus can become airborne, it's highly contagious and it can wipe out a massive population.

"It's the poor man's atomic bomb," said Torrence, in a Tuesday interview with the Daily Sun. "You don't need a biotech industry to create smallpox. ... It's the perfect weapon."

It's also an available weapon. Federal reports show that the Soviet Union manufactured 100 tons of smallpox virus as a biochemical warfare agent before the country disbanded. That much smallpox is enough to kill the world population multiple times over.

Where much of that 100 tons of virus ended up is not completely known, Torrence said.

If terrorists decided to unleash smallpox in the U.S., a mass effort to vaccinate could take place, and a number of people would survive as a result of the vaccination. But, the vaccination itself carries a number of problems.

Of 300 million people vaccinated, about 300,000 would suffer from adverse side effects, about 4,000 to 15,000 people would suffer from life-threatening complications and 300 to 600 people would die, according to the Center for Disease Control.

The odds for those who get the vaccine, which has to happen within a few days of contracting the virus, are better than those who have smallpox and go without it. Still, Torrence and Civitello are working to find drugs to counter vaccine complications, along with drugs that would fight the virus itself.

According to Torrence, the resources in the U.S. and the overall health of the population gives us a much better advantage than the developing world.

So, for the terrorist that unleashes smallpox on U.S. soil, a possible irony awaits. The virus would most likely spread and wipe out far greater populations of developing countries in the Middle East, Africa and Asia.

"There's a chance we would see a ricochet effect," Torrence said.

Still, the United States has a long way to go to escape vulnerability, but Torrence believes that education, a stronger public health system and more enforceable international treaties on bioterrorism weapons could would go a long way in protecting the population.

A January study by the New England Journal of Medicine showed that most people knew little to nothing about the disease. In a survey of 1006 people asked whether they thought smallpox was contagious, 111 said no. And 87 percent of those surveyed said it was either "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that a person would survive smallpox. The correct answer was "not very likely."

Torrence said the public should be educated, so they understand the disease and the threat. He added that a strong public health system with vigilant surveillance of signs of smallpox would allow for a faster and more effective response.

"We can reduce the risk," he said.

Reporter Seth Muller can be reached at 913-8607 or smuller@azdailysun.com

PLEASE BEAR THIS STORY IN MIND WHEN CONSIDERING THE PANDEMIC THAT COULD LITERALLY BE RELEASED BY INFECTING THE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE FROM DOZENS OF COUNTRIES PREPARING TO VISIT MECCA AND OTHER HOLY SITES DURING RAMADAN....!!!

:shock:
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Postby J.B. Stone » 09/ 27/ 03 11:15 pm

Biodefence lab? Not in my backyard

BOSTON

THE United States government is pumping billions into universities to set up biodefence laboratories across the country to study deadly viruses such as anthrax.


But the trouble is that many communities are losing sleep over the prospect that some rogue strains may escape.

Some of them are filing suits to keep the labs from their neighbourhoods.

Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson recently announced US$350 million (S$600 million) in federal grants to eight biodefence programmes around the US.

'We have moved with unprecedented speed and determination to prepare for a bioterror attack or any other public-health crisis, since the attacks of 2001,' he said.

But that speed and determination is seen by some as a dangerous rush that could increase the risk of harm from biological agents.

In Boston, a coalition of community groups plans to sue the Boston University Medical Center, which is bidding for federal funds to build a biodefence lab.

In California and New Mexico, communities are suing to stop biodefence experiments at federal government facilities such as the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

The University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, meanwhile, has been fighting freedom-of-information requests for details of its biodefence research.

Some 30 expanded or new biodefence facilities are being considered nationwide. Critics point to previous problems with radioactive leaks and the handling of bioagents.

In May, Energy Department inspector-general Gregory Friedman testified that Los Alamos 'could not provide adequate assurance that classified, sensitive, or proprietary information was appropriately protected'.

For their part, lab officials say their studies of the new facilities show any environmental effect would be minimal. This is despite the fact that one of them lies in an area of earthquake fault lines and Los Alamos has faced major wildfires.

Nations that signed the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention of 1975 are prohibited from researching offensive biological weapons.

But critics say such research is inherently dual-use, meaning it has to involve test quantities of potential bioweapon substances such as anthrax.

'With biological weapons, the line between offence and defence is exceedingly difficult to draw,' says Ms Jacqueline Cabasso, head of the Western States Legal Foundation, which monitors weapons programmes.The Monitor Group

http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/news/s ... 39,00.html

GREAT...!!!

They've just spent the last 50 years concocting increasingly malevolent and sneaky means of dispersing Bio-Chemical Terror...and...NOW...

It suddenly occurs to them to find ways to defend ourselves...???

Way to think ahead....eh...???

'We have moved with unprecedented speed and determination to prepare for a bioterror attack or any other public-health crisis, since the attacks of 2001,' he said.

But that speed and determination is seen by some as a dangerous rush that could increase the risk of harm from biological agents.


Perhaps that should have occurred to them BEFORE they instituted Project 112/SHAD...!!!!

Naaaahhhh.....too easy to see coming.

Better to amass tens of thousands of TONS of the lethal substances and then go about laboriously and VERY expensively disassembling and incinerating them...and just ignore the people killed, maimed, and poisoned in the proces.....easier to just look away and PRETEND it couldn't POSSIBLY boomerang around and whap us in the collective ASS....!!!

But then, what do I KNOW.....????

I'm but a

Human Test Rat
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Postby J.B. Stone » 09/ 27/ 03 11:23 pm

U.S. organizing network to track bioterror attacks
Labs urged to develop forensics to catch culprits

By Scott Shane
Sun Staff


Originally published September 26, 2003

Drawing on lessons from the anthrax mailings of 2001, the federal government is organizing a national network of laboratories and experts on the chemical fingerprints of deadly germs to swiftly trace the source of future bioterrorist attacks.

The core of the network will be at Fort Detrick in Frederick, where a National Bioforensics Analysis Center will maintain databases of viruses, bacteria and other pathogens for comparison with microbes used in crimes. Fort Detrick houses the chief military biodefense research center, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. Next door, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases is building a $105 million laboratory equipped to handle the deadliest organisms on earth.

In an article published today in the journal Science, scientists from the FBI and other laboratories call on their colleagues to create "a robust microbial forensics field" by helping write standards that can make germ comparisons as reliable as fingerprints or human DNA analysis in solving crimes.

"Scientists can play a substantial role in thwarting the use of bioweapons by developing tools to detect and to determine the source of the pathogen and to identify those who use such biological agents to create terror or to commit crime," write the nine authors, led by FBI scientist Bruce Budowle.

In its two-year search for the person whose anthrax-laced letters killed five people, the FBI has recruited scientists to analyze the powdery spores recovered from the letters.

Genetic analysis identified the anthrax used in the attacks as the Ames strain, named by Army scientists at Fort Detrick in 1981 and used at about 20 of labs. Scientists at the Northern Arizona University and the Institute for Genomic Research in Silver Spring have fine-tuned the research in an attempt to track the mailed anthrax back to a specific lab.

Other scientists have devised ways to trace the geographic origin of the water and the kind of nutrients used to grow anthrax spores. If someone is charged with the anthrax mailings, such studies could become part of the government's case.

http://www.sunspot.net/news/nationworld ... -headlines

WELL....GOLLLLEEEEE.....!!!

That wouldn't be the SAME Fort Detrick that housed Project 112/SHAD, now WOULD it...???

8)

WHAT a coincidence....and it appears to be the SAME Fort Detrick that spawned the Anthrax attacks after 9-11.

Hmmmm.....there is NO OTHER place in this country that the elements could have originated from...!!!

Hey, wait a minute...wasn't Project 112/SHAD supposed to be the DEFENSIVE testing program to secure us all from that stuff...???

Well, it WAS "supposed" to be, but in their infinite "wisdom" the government NEVER considered what would happen if the stuff got out of the "good guys" hands....which is my central argument as to why they never should have CREATED that crap in the first place.

Am I a lucky guesser, or what...???

8)
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Postby J.B. Stone » 09/ 27/ 03 11:37 pm

EVERYBODY WANTS TO GET INTO THE ACT...

BIOTERROR BUGS

09/03/03

The national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention classifies potential bioterror agents in three groups based on the ease of dissemination and the risk of death.
From Our Advertiser


CLASS A

Anthrax (Bacillus anthracis): Spore-forming bacterium. Used in the still-unsolved attack that killed five people when spore-laced letters were mailed in fall 2001. Can be fatal if not treated with antibiotics.

Botulism (Clostridium botulinum toxin): Nerve toxin produced by this bacterium in improperly canned foods causes rare but serious paralytic illness. Fatal in about 8 percent of cases.

Plague (Yersinia pestis): Bacterium carried by rodents and fleas. Could be used in aerosol attack. Fever, nausea, vomiting and death can ensue without antibiotic treatment in the first 24 hours.

Smallpox (variola major): Perhaps the most-feared biological agent. Highly contagious virus causes fever, vomiting and pus-filled blisters, and is 30 percent fatal. No cases reported worldwide since 1977 because of vaccines. New research by OHSU says those already vaccinated may retain immunity far longer than previously thought.

Tularemia (Francisella tularensis): Hardy bacterium spread by rodents, ticks and deerflies. Symptoms include sudden fever, chills, headaches, muscle aches, weakness and pneumonia. Can be fatal if not treated with antibiotics.

Viral hemorrhagic fevers (Ebola, Marburg, Lass and others): Deadly group. Patients with severe cases show signs of bleeding under the skin, in internal organs or from the mouth, eyes or ears, but usually die of other causes. With few exceptions, there is no treatment.

CLASS B

Brucellosis (Brucella species): Bacterium spread among farm animals. In humans, it can cause flulike symptoms and chronic fevers, joint pain and fatigue. Treated with antibiotics.

Food safety threats (Salmonella, E. coli, shigella): Salmonella was used in the fall of 1984 by disciples of Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh to sicken 751 people in The Dalles, the first large biological attack in the United States.

Q fever (Coxiella burnetii): Bacterium carried by cattle, sheep, and goats. Causes fever, severe headache, confusion, sore throat, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain. Treated with antibiotics.

Ricin toxin: A poison made from waste left from processing castor beans. Can be in powder, mist or pellet form, or dissolved in water. If inhaled, it causes difficulty breathing; the skin might turn blue. Potentially fatal; there is no antidote.

Others: Staphylococcal enterotoxin B; Typhus fever (Rickettsia prowazekii); viral encephalitis; Epsilon toxin of Clostridium perfringen; Glanders (Burkholderia mallei); Melioidosis (Burkholderia pseudomallei); Psittacosis (Chlamydia psittaci)

CLASS C

Nipah virus: Emerging disease first identified in Singapore and Malaysia in 1999 and associated with exposure to pigs among patients who died of febrile encephalitis, a swelling of the brain.

Hantavirus: Identified after an unexplained outbreak in May 1993 in the Southwest in which previously healthy young adults suddenly developed acute respiratory symptoms. About half died. The virus is spread in rodent droppings. There is no cure. Source: National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

http://www.oregonlive.com/science/orego ... 284260.xml

EVEN THE FREAKS IN OREGON ARE STARTING TO WORRY MORE ABOUT BIO-TERRORISM THAN STOPPING LOGGING OR THE PRICE OF GOOD POT...

Hantavirus: Identified after an unexplained outbreak in May 1993 in the Southwest in which previously healthy young adults suddenly developed acute respiratory symptoms. About half died. The virus is spread in rodent droppings. There is no cure. Source: National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


AW SHUCKS...!!!

I heered that a clever sorta guy could be a vectorin' the Incurable Hanta Virus right on back to those infected rabbits flowing out of Fort Douglas - Deseret Test Center - Dugway Proving Grounds.....the old stompin' grounds of Project 112/SHAD and the originators of the VX Gas cloud that killed them 6300 sheeps in Skull Valley in the 60's....hmmmmm.....

Just a coincidence, I'm sure.
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Postby J.B. Stone » 09/ 28/ 03 9:16 am

YOU MIGHT AS WELL BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THESE PLACE NAMES AS THEY NO DOUBT WILL INFLUENCE YOUR FUTURE:


Chemical Weapons Destruction

* Background
* Russia's Stockpile
* International Assistance
* Canadian Contributions
* Canada's CW Non-Proliferation Policy

Background:

At the end of the Soviet era, the Russian Federation inherited a massive arsenal of chemical weapons (CW). Indeed, at approximately 40,000 metric tonnes, Russia's declared stockpile of Category I chemical weapons is the world's largest. Destroying these weapons, as Russia has undertaken to do pursuant to Articles I, IV and V of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), will be both a costly (an estimated 11 billion US dollars) and lengthy undertaking.

The CWC requires all States Parties possessing chemical weapons to destroy them in a safe and environmentally friendly manner. While a State Party may select and apply the appropriate destruction methods for its chemical weapons, certain methods (i.e. dumping in any body of water, land burial, or open pit burning) are not permitted. The CWC, which also determines the rate and the sequence of chemical weapons destruction (CWD), stipulates that final destruction of national stockpiles is to be accomplished not later than 10 years after the Convention's entry into force (i.e. by 29 April 2007). In exceptional circumstances however, a five year extension of this deadline may be granted a (i.e. 29 April 2012). The Russian Federation has formally requested this extension. Destruction of all CW is to be verified through the continuous on-site presence of inspectors from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW).
Russia's Stockpile:

Russia's chemical weapons are stored at seven facilities, six of which are located west of the Ural Mountains and one east. Five of these sites are repositories for deadly Organophosphorous agents (i.e. nerve agents) such as sarin, soman and VX (approximately 32,500 metric tonnes, or 80% of Russia's total CW stockpile). Two others house the Vesicants (i.e. blister agents) mustard, lewisite and lewisite/mustard mixture (roughly 5,500 metric tonnes, or 20% of the total stockpile). While most of the nerve agents remain in their weapons casings -- including artillery shells, rocket and missile warheads, aerial bombs and spray tanks -- the blistering agents are stored in bulk containers.


Chemical Weapons Destruction

* Background
* Russia's Stockpile
* International Assistance
* Canadian Contributions
* Canada's CW Non-Proliferation Policy

Background:

At the end of the Soviet era, the Russian Federation inherited a massive arsenal of chemical weapons (CW). Indeed, at approximately 40,000 metric tonnes, Russia's declared stockpile of Category I chemical weapons is the world's largest. Destroying these weapons, as Russia has undertaken to do pursuant to Articles I, IV and V of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), will be both a costly (an estimated 11 billion US dollars) and lengthy undertaking.

The CWC requires all States Parties possessing chemical weapons to destroy them in a safe and environmentally friendly manner. While a State Party may select and apply the appropriate destruction methods for its chemical weapons, certain methods (i.e. dumping in any body of water, land burial, or open pit burning) are not permitted. The CWC, which also determines the rate and the sequence of chemical weapons destruction (CWD), stipulates that final destruction of national stockpiles is to be accomplished not later than 10 years after the Convention's entry into force (i.e. by 29 April 2007). In exceptional circumstances however, a five year extension of this deadline may be granted a (i.e. 29 April 2012). The Russian Federation has formally requested this extension. Destruction of all CW is to be verified through the continuous on-site presence of inspectors from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW).
Russia's Stockpile:

Russia's chemical weapons are stored at seven facilities, six of which are located west of the Ural Mountains and one east. Five of these sites are repositories for deadly Organophosphorous agents (i.e. nerve agents) such as sarin, soman and VX (approximately 32,500 metric tonnes, or 80% of Russia's total CW stockpile). Two others house the Vesicants (i.e. blister agents) mustard, lewisite and lewisite/mustard mixture (roughly 5,500 metric tonnes, or 20% of the total stockpile). While most of the nerve agents remain in their weapons casings -- including artillery shells, rocket and missile warheads, aerial bombs and spray tanks -- the blistering agents are stored in bulk containers.
Stockpiling site 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
% reserve 18.8 17.4 17.2 13.6 14.2 15.9 2.9
VX X X X X X - -
Sarin X X X X X - -
Soman X X X X X - -
Mustard - - - - - - X
Lewisite - - - - X X X
Mustard-lewisite mixture - - - - - - X

Stockpiling Sites

1. Pochep, Bryansk region
2. Maradykovskiy, Kirov region
3. Leonidovka, Penza region
4. Shchuch'ye, Kurgan region
5. Kizner, Udmurt Republic
6. Kambarka, Udmurt Republic
7. Gornyi, Saratov region

* Source: Russian Munitions Agency
International Assistance:

While destruction of Russia's CW stockpile is a strictly Russian responsibility, a number of countries (Canada included) have provided financial assistance to this effort in recent years. Most of this assistance has been directed towards security upgrades at the storage sites and to the construction of CWD facilities at Shchuch'ye and Gorny. International support for Russian CW destruction under the Global Partnership will enhance international security and safety by helping to prevent terrorists, or those that harbour them, from acquiring or developing chemical weapons and/or related materials, equipment and technology. And by helping Russia to meet its CWC obligations, the Global Partnership also promises to strengthen multilateral non-proliferation, arms control and disarmament efforts. Financial assistance to Russia's CW destruction effort is coordinated both within the G8 and by donor countries on the margins of OPCW Executive Council Meetings in The Hague.
Canadian Contributions:

Before the Global Partnership was formed, Canada contributed roughly $5.35 million to the construction of a Chemical Weapons Destruction Facility (CWDF) at Shchuch'ye. Canada's contributions, including $5 million in 2002, were directed towards several high priority infrastructure projects at Shchuch'ye. These projects included construction of a 3.89 km access road to the site's industrial area, construction of a 10 kV power line to supply electrical power for the CWDF, and partial funding of a 105km natural gas line that will supply gas service to the CWDF. As an initial project under the Global Partnership, Canada will contribute $30 million to support the construction of the chemical weapons destruction site at Shchuchy’e (Kurgan Oblast).

Canada is currently evaluating several options for CW destruction funding. Key to Canada's ability to assist Russian destruction efforts will be conclusion of a bilateral CWD agreement with the Russian Federation that satisfies the Global Partnership's Guidelines for New or Expanded Cooperation Projects.


Canada's CW Non-Proliferation Policy:

The Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) leads on this issue for the Government of Canada. DFAIT divisions responsible for this issue are the Non-Proliferation, Arms Control and Disarmament Division (IDA) and the Nuclear and Chemical Disarmament Implementation Agency (IDN).

http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/foreign_po ... ion-en.asp

AND, IF YOU WISH TO HEAD SOUTH....THERE'S ALWAYS SAFE HAVEN IN CUBA...

Editorial Reviews
Description
In September 2001, three leading journalists on the staff of the New York Times published the provocative and disturbing results of their investigation into biological weapons. For months, Nova’s cameras followed the journalists as they pursued their inquiries. Bioterror reveals for the first time how the U.S. planned to bomb Cuba with biological weapons during the 1961 missile crisis, tours abandoned germ war factories built on a frightening scale by the former Soviet Union, and takes an exclusive look at current U.S. work on bioweapons. Is this new research an essential protection against the next terrorist attack? Or a provocative violation of the international treaty banning offensive development?

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/de ... lance&st=*
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Postby J.B. Stone » 10/ 02/ 03 11:13 am

This is a HUGE breakthrough in American Military Law and a precedent setting decision...!!!

:D

Here's ONE way to "solve the problem" of continued Human Experimentation:


SHAD Veterans Win Significant Decision
Court Finds Jurisdiction Over Claims that Defense Officials
Covered-up Information to Prevent Veterans’ Medical
Benefits Claims

Military veterans used as test subjects in chemical and
biological warfare experiments by the United States
government in the 1960s, won a huge legal victory yesterday
in federal court. In a thoughtful 17-page opinion, United
States District Judge Rosemary M. Collyer rejected an
attempt to dismiss a lawsuit seeking damages for government
officials’ cover-up of the experiments and denial of
information to veterans potentially harmed by exposure to
chemical and biological materials. The Court ruled that the
law and “common sense” supported her jurisdiction to
hear Plaintiffs’ lawsuit and that the defendants’
arguments otherwise were “irrelevant.”

“The impact of this decision for veterans seeking to hold
government officials accountable for their actions is hard
to underestimate,” according to Shaw Pittman LLP partner,
David Cynamon, the lead attorney on the case. “The Court
found clear jurisdiction to hold government officials liable
for the harm that they cause by deliberately misinforming
the public,” continued Cynamon, “which is a total
victory for veterans.” Former Defense Secretary Robert S.
McNamara is among the defendants named in a class action
lawsuit for allegedly covering up medical information
without which veterans of biological and chemical warfare
testing cannot receive needed medical benefits. The
plaintiffs include veterans, their families, and the Vietnam
Veterans of America (“VVA”), who allege a deliberate and
ongoing cover-up by federal officials to conceal and ignore
relevant documents, many of which contain personal medical
information that would allow veterans to seek benefits from
the Department of Veterans Affairs (“DVA”) for the
health effects of the government’s testing of weapons of
mass destruction on them.

The case now shifts to determining whether the named
officials are immune from liability for their actions. To
avoid trial now, the defendants will have to argue that a
reasonable government official serving in the 1990s and
2000s did not know it was wrong to block veterans from
making legitimate claims for medical care and other benefits
by covering-up information and knowingly misleading them.
“We believe that the law has been clearly established for
a long time that government officials cannot knowingly
mislead citizens or cover-up embarrassing government
activities just to avoid responsibility or embarrassment,”
Cynamon said. In any event, it is now very clear that it is
illegal to do so. Department of Defense – and all other
government officials – should think very carefully about
the legal ramifications of simply parroting the “party
line.” The “old ‘protecting the government’ defense
by federal officials is now as dead as ‘the Board of
Directors approved it’ defense is for corrupt corporate
officials, concluded Cynamon.

The suit is being brought by Shaw-Pittman of Washington, D.C.


Douglas J. Rosinski

Shaw Pittman LLP
2300 N Street N.W.
Washington, DC 20037-1128
douglas.rosinski@shawpittman.com
202.663.9097
202.663.8007 (fax)



Shaw Pittman: DOD Allegedly Covered Up Medical Records
U.S. Newswire
30 Oct 13:29

Shaw Pittman: Vietnam-Era DOD Secretary Robert Mcnamara, Current
VA and DOD Officials Allegedly Covered Up Medical Records
To: National Desk
Contact: Nicole Quigley, 202-973-1328, for Shaw Pittman, LLP,
or nquigley@levick.com

WASHINGTON, Oct. 30 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Former Defense Secretary
Robert S. McNamara is among 11 defendants named in two
first-of-their-kind class action lawsuits for allegedly covering up
medical records without which veterans of atomic, biological and
chemical warfare testing cannot receive needed medical and other
benefits. The plaintiffs include veterans, their families, and the
Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA), who allege a deliberate and
ongoing cover-up by U.S. government officials to conceal and ignore
relevant records, many of which are personal medical records that
would allow them to seek proper benefits from the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) for the often devastating long-term health
effects of the government's testing of weapons of mass destruction.

Brought by the law firm of Shaw Pittman, LLP, the complaints --
one for veterans exposed to atomic detonations and the other for
veterans exposed to biological and chemical tests, as well as their
survivors -- aim to hold the government officials personally
responsible for their involvement in illegal and unethical
activities and to obtain justice for aging veterans. The
complaints tell disturbingly similar stories of government and
military officials protecting the government and themselves from
liability for the effects of cold war atomic, biological, and
chemical experiments on their own troops, sailors, airmen, and
marines.

The complaints point to several smoking guns, including a White
House memo that describes the classification of records as a tactic
to minimize public relations risks and ultimately limit the
government's legal liability. The veterans and their families also
cite original test documents and reports that record large-scale
radiation overexposures and medical test procedures that directly
contradict government and military official statements that
veterans were not used as test subjects and were not exposed to
unsafe levels of radiation.

The "Atomic Veteran" plaintiffs consist of approximately 415,000
surviving veterans exposed to radiation as part of the government's
atomic testing and military programs in the 1940-1950s and their
survivors. The plaintiffs in the second complaint are the
approximately 10,000 military personnel used as involuntary test
subjects in biological and chemical warfare tests in the 1960s
known as "Project SHAD" (Shipboard Hazard and Defense).
Additionally, VVA serves as a named plaintiff in the SHAD case on
behalf of the thousands of Vietnam-era veterans affected by the
government's actions

"The VA has a statutory mandate to advocate for and protect the
interests of these veterans, but instead VA officials have
purposefully failed them. This is the age of Enron, when the
government contends that you are personally responsible for your
unethical decisions. We're holding up a mirror and expecting them
to practice what they preach," said Shaw Pittman partner David
Cynamon, who filed the complaints.

"America's veterans deserve proper health care for illnesses
that may be due to exposure to harmful agents as a result of their
military service," said VVA National President Thomas Corey.
"Veterans deserve to be told the truth about their military
service, as well as accountability from senior bureaucrats and
other government officials. Justice for our nation's veterans is
at the heart of VVA's mission. This class action will help
veterans obtain the justice to which they have long been entitled,"
Corey added.

Former Navy crewmember of the USS Navarro in 1963 and plaintiff
Robert Bates said, "I wasn't asked if I wanted to be a human guinea
pig. I wasn't told that I was part of an experiment until thirty
years later. And now, I can't get my complete medical records from
the government so that I can get needed benefits." Bates suffers
from congestive heart failure and joint problems thought to be
related to the chemical warfare tests.

The Shaw Pittman complaints allege a policy that government and
military officials began in the 1940s and current officials
continue to carry out in order to keep veterans from claiming their
just medical benefits. For example, government and military
officials admit that Project SHAD medical records were and remain
"classified" and unavailable to veterans attempting to claim VA
benefits for health problems arising from biological and chemical
agents used on them by their own military. The government contends
that other relevant records disappeared, were destroyed, or never
existed.

"They tell you that they can't give you benefits until you prove
you were involved, but they keep the documents that can prove it in
a sealed vault behind their desks. This is not the government my
husband intended to serve," said Pat Broudy, whose husband died due
to lymphoma, a cancer known to be caused by radiation exposure.
Her husband had served in the occupation of Nagasaki, Japan,
trained on a radioactive target ship, and participated in mock
assaults on ground zero following atomic detonations in the Nevada
desert but was denied VA benefits.

Shaw Pittman began representing veterans as a result of a pro
bono project that relied on the firm's litigation and scientific
expertise. "As Americans, we expect our government and military
officials to adhere to a basic standard of legal and ethical
conduct. We've seen Congress and the Administration rightly insist
that corporate officials be held legally accountable for their
actions. They need to know that they can't hide behind their
organizations anymore," said Shaw Pittman attorney Douglas
Rosinski.

The complaints were filed October 29, 2002 in the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia.

Shaw Pittman, LLP has offices in Washington, D.C., New York,
Northern Virginia, London and Los Angeles. The firm provides
business and technology legal services on a global basis. It can
be accessed online at http://www.shawpittman.com.

http://www.vva.org/shad/

I am one of the Plaintiffs in this case.

“The Court
found clear jurisdiction to hold government officials liable
for the harm that they cause by deliberately misinforming
the public,” continued Cynamon, “which is a total
victory for veterans.”


8)
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Postby J.B. Stone » 10/ 02/ 03 1:10 pm

What Should We Call It... Slow Death By Coverup?
By Thomas D. Segel
September 29, 2003

When the blast erupted, his back was turned away from the explosion. He was crouched down in a trench, his head down between his legs, eyes closed and his hands covering his eyes. The blinding light was so intense, he could see the bones of his hands, as outlines through his transparent flesh. This is how Marine Corporal Theo Bennett describes his initial exposure to an atomic test. "The flash held me in rapt suspense for several seconds, " he says, "then I heard the voice from the loudspeakers tell all personnel to stand and observe the fireball. The fireball, a great reddish, expanding orb of fire came out of the explosion, then a gray pillar of steam, smoke, and dust particles rushed skyward, to form the stalk of the bomb, remaining suspended against the blue sky for several minutes.

The loudspeaker voice next instructed the Marines to prepare to experience the shock wave, which would spread outward from ground zero. It was followed by another shock wave, which returned toward the direction of the blast. Winds from these waves were so fierce; they were almost blown off their feet. Said one Marine, "It was like a freight train going by."

It should be noted these servicemen had been placed in open trenches just 3.97 miles from ground zero. For all tests held previously, military personnel had been 7 miles from the blast. They were in reality, placed in position as test subjects, because nobody knew what would happen once the bomb exploded. Marines and soldiers alike were there were no protective clothing, no gas masks, no dosimeters. no protection at all, except a trench dug in the desert sand.

Military personnel, including Corporal Bennett, were next loaded into open trucks and driven closer to the target center. At one display site they observed the charred remains of various animals that had been staked out to assess their possibility of survival. None remained alive. At the next display site, they viewed the aftermath of what an atomic blast could do to trucks, jeeps, vans and tanks. They were now 900 yards from ground zero and all that could be observed were twisted metal remains. Everything had been tossed along with the force of the explosion, or vaporized on the spot.

The atomic bomb test was called Tumbler-Snapper Shot IV. It became a reality when the explosive devise was dropped from a bomb bay of a B45 aircraft flying at 23,050 feet over Nevada. It detonated at 0930 Pacific Daylight Savings Time at a height of 1,040 feet above Area #7, Target 3 of Yucca Flat, and Nevada on May 1, 1952. This fiery blast was only the opening act for a scenario of health problems, which would follow Theo Bennett though his life.

One month after the atomic test, Bennett was sent to the hospital with a raging temperature of 105 degrees and showing difficulty breathing. November of 1954 he was found to be 100% sterile and unable to father children. In March 1955 he developed a bloodstream infection and a severe case of boils. June 1957, he was disabled with Pneumonia for three weeks. Minor problems continued until May 1971 when he was diagnosed with Hypoglycemia. By 1977 he had developed a leukemia type ailment, a low-grade fever, swollen glands and suffered a 30-pound weight loss. He was treated with bed rest and immune system therapy. He was also treated for toxic pneumonitis and his lungs were found to be cloudy like those of a heavy smoker, even though he had not smoked. The respiratory difficulties have continued throughout the years, with shortness of breath, cough and chest pain. The only event in his life Theo Bennett can mark which could have bought on these unusual ailments was that atomic blast in the Nevada desert.

According to the National Association of Atomic Veterans (NAAV), 225,000 United States service personnel were ordered to participate in the atomic testing program between 1945 and 1962. It is true there were those who volunteered to be part of the program. It is also true many were there because they had been drafted into service by the government. Refusal to participate could have resulted in court martial, dishonorable discharge, charges of mutiny, treason, prison or even execution.

No protection of any kind was provided for these human subjects and when problems started to develop, our government did everything possible to cover-up its failed programs. The Atomic Energy Commission in collusion with the Departments of Defense and Energy and the Nuclear Power Industry has constantly lied to the former test participants, claims the NAAV. These agencies, according to the veterans group, have initiated an elaborate cover-up to convince the public that there was no danger from radiation. The cover-up continues today

As part of this fraud, the government has developed what it calls "reconstructed radiation dosage levels". The idea itself is ridiculous because there were no radiation measurements taken at the tests to "reconstruct". Added to this, the so-called "reconstructions" were made purposely low as a device to deny claims of veterans and widows.

Twenty years ago the New York Times had an important piece of investigative journalism that supported the cover-up claims of atomic veterans. The newspaper concluded there was no longer any doubt that radiation dosages during the tests were much higher than those which were "reconstructed" and used by the VA and DoD to deny legitimate claims.

Today, many of those test victim veterans have died. Thousands are sick and all they have asked is that the United States of America take care of them as it promised. For Theo Bennett and most of his fellow comrades-in-arms, there has been no resolution to the matter in more than 50 years.

http://www.gopusa.com/tomsegel/ts_0929.shtml
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Postby J.B. Stone » 10/ 03/ 03 8:30 pm

RECENT HISTORY IN RETROSPECT:

Many Iraqi Arabs Never Heard of 1988 Gassing of Kurds
By Scheherezade Faramarzi Associated Press Writer
Published: Apr 27, 2003

MANQOUBEH, Iraq (AP) - While the horrific images of streets strewn with bodies shook the world, many Iraqi Arabs remain unaware of Saddam Hussein's gas attack that killed thousands of Iraqi Kurds 15 years ago.

And those Arabs who heard rumors of the slaughter in the northern city of Halabja say they did not believe them at the time. Some remain unconvinced today.

The chemical attack on the Kurds stands as one of the most egregious examples of Saddam's brutality against his own people. It was cited by President Bush as proof that Saddam had the willingness and ability to use weapons of mass destruction - a key justification for the war that toppled Saddam.

The attack and its memory also underscore the different experiences of the Arabs and Kurds who live uneasily as neighbors in northern Iraq. The success of any post-Saddam government could falter if relations between the two ethnic groups deteriorate.

Halabja lies on the southern fringe of Iraqi Kurdistan, near the Iranian border. Some 5,000 Kurds died there when they were attacked with bombs carrying mustard gas and other poisonous gases on March 16, 1988, part of a scorched-earth campaign to wipe out a Kurdish rebellion in northern Iraq.

It was easy for Saddam's repressive regime, which enforced strict censorship, to keep news of the slaughter from spreading. As a result, very few people in the village of Manqouba, 155 miles west of Halabja, had heard of the chemical massacre there. And even fewer believed it.

Iraqi Arabs in other towns in northern Iraq's oil-producing province of Kirkuk showed similar disbelief, even though Kurds, Arabs and Turkmen live side by side in the region. In fact, until Iraqi security documents were seized during the Kurdish uprising of 1991, even many Kurds of northern Iraq had not heard of the Halabja attack or didn't know details of it.

Nafeh Mohammed Saleh, 42, and his brother Adel, 40, were soldiers in the Iraqi army during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s. Adel was serving in Panjwain, in northern Iraq, close to Halabja.

"We heard there had been a chemical attack but we didn't know where - in the north or the south or the central sector," Adel said.

Nafeh said he had seen a video of the dead that his Kurdish friends had shown him, with children and women lying dead in the streets.

"But I don't know if it was a genuine film," Nafeh said, fingering his worry beads. "People talked, but we didn't hear it from anyone who had seen it himself. We still have our doubts."

He added: "I heard they bombed Halabja because they wanted to get the Iranians out. I heard they had bombed them with crushed stones - not chemicals."

On March 15, 1988, Halabja fell to the Kurdish peshmerga fighters of Jalal Talabani's Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, which was supported by Iranian revolutionary guards. The next morning, Iraqi MiG and Mirage jets dropped bombs that engulfed the town in a sickly stench. In the space of a few hours, 5,000 people had died.

The attack was ordered by Gen. Ali Hassan al-Majid, a cousin of Saddam who was later dubbed "Chemical Ali" by opponents. He was believed killed in coalition bombing this month in Basra.

The United Nations and human rights groups have assembled a mass of evidence of the Iraqi chemical attack on Halabja, including witness accounts and internal Iraqi military documents. However, Saddam's regime always denied any role, saying Iran gassed the city.

Wassim Mohammed al-Hamdani, 33, said he only heard of the Halabja gassing a couple of months ago. "Kurds told us that they were bombed by chemical weapons," he said.

He said he believed the attack had occurred because the man who told him was a Muslim and true Muslims do not lie.

But Salem Mohammed al-Hamdani, 45, insisted that the attack could not have occurred. He said he was in Halabja recently.

"Impossible, impossible," he said, using his index finger to stress his point.

~~~~~

ON THE OTHER HAND:

www.pbs.org/wnet/wideangle/shows/saddam/photo.html
homepages.tig.com.au/~simko/halabja.html
www.netiran.com/Htdocs/Clippings/Art/020710XXAR01.html
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Postby J.B. Stone » 10/ 03/ 03 9:31 pm

Lethal Legacy: Bioweapons for Sale
S. African Scientist Offers U.S. Agents Cache of Man-Made Pathogens


Dirty bombs, anthrax and smallpox: An informative guide for to understanding the threat and protecting you and your family.


_____Outlook_____

By Joby Warrick and John Mintz
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, April 20, 2003; Page A01

First of two articles

PRETORIA, South Africa -- Daan Goosen's calling card to the FBI was a vial of bacteria he had freeze-dried and hidden inside a toothpaste tube for secret passage to the United States.

From among hundreds of flasks in his Pretoria lab, the South African scientist picked a man-made strain that was sure to impress: a microbial Frankenstein that fused the genes of a common intestinal bug with DNA from the pathogen that causes the deadly illness gas gangrene.

"This will show the Americans what we are capable of," Goosen said at the time.

On May 6, 2002, Goosen slipped the parcel into the hands of a retired CIA officer who couriered the microbes 8,000 miles for a drop-off with the FBI. If U.S. officials liked what they saw, Goosen said he was prepared to offer much more: An entire collection of pathogens developed by a secret South African bioweapons research program Goosen once headed.

Goosen's extraordinary offer to the FBI, outlined in documents obtained by The Washington Post and interviews with key participants, promised scores of additional vials containing the bacteria that cause anthrax, plague, salmonella and botulism, as well as antidotes for many of the diseases. Several strains, like the bacterial hybrid in the toothpaste tube, had been genetically altered, a technique used by weapons scientists to make diseases harder to detect and defeat. All were to be delivered to the U.S. government for safekeeping and to help strengthen U.S. defenses against future terrorism attacks.

U.S. officials considered the offer but balked at the asking price -- $5 million and immigration permits for Goosen and up to 19 associates and family members to come to the United States. The deal collapsed in confusion last year after skeptical FBI agents turned the matter over to South African authorities, who twice investigated Goosen but never charged him.

Participants in the failed deal differ on what happened and why. But they agree that the bacterial strains remain in private hands in South Africa, where they have continued to attract attention from individuals interested in acquiring them.

The episode throws new light on the extraordinarily difficult task of preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. South Africa, which built nuclear, chemical and biological arsenals under apartheid, renounced its weapons in 1993, and sought to destroy all traces of them, including instruction manuals and bacterial seed stocks. But like other countries that have attempted such a rollback, such as Ukraine and Kazakhstan, South Africa finds itself in a gray zone where weapons of the past pose serious dangers for the present.

"The weapons programs were ostensibly terminated, yet clearly they weren't able to destroy everything," said Jeffrey M. Bale of the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies, which is carrying out a study of South Africa's weapons programs. "The fact that Goosen and others are providing samples and being approached by foreign parties suggests that these things never really went away."

To disarmament experts, the case is especially troubling because of the kinds of terrorist-ready weapons produced by Project Coast, a top-secret biological and chemical program created by South Africa's white-minority government, which came to light in the late 1990s. Unlike U.S. and Soviet programs that amassed huge stockpiles of bombs and missiles for biological warfare, Project Coast specialized in the tools of terrorism and assassination -- including "stealth" weapons that could kill or incapacitate without leaving a trace. The program's military commanders also researched anti-fertility drugs that could be clandestinely applied in black neighborhoods, and explored -- but never produced -- biological weapons that would selectively target the country's black majority population.

Even if all of Project Coast's bacterial strains are secured, the know-how and skills acquired by dozens of its scientists may be impossible to contain, South African officials acknowledged in interviews. Several key scientists have pursued business interests overseas since the program was disbanded shortly before South Africa's transition to democracy. Others, including Goosen, have acknowledged they were approached by recruiters claiming to represent foreign governments or extremist groups. While the United States has spent tens of millions of dollars to re-train and re-employ weapons scientists in the former Soviet Union, many Project Coast scientists have been shunned by their peers and left to try to support themselves any way they can.

"It would have been galling to most South Africans to see their government take care of these scientists, after all the revelations about them," said Chandre Gould, an investigator for South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission in the late 1990s and now the co-author of an official United Nations study on Project Coast. "They were part of a program that tried to kill people in this society."
Novel Weapons

The failed deal with the South African scientist is documented in hundreds of pages of memos, contracts and reports. Many of the documents were provided by Don Mayes , a former CIA operative who acted as go-between in the deal, and helped arrange for the bacterial sample to be brought to the United States for testing. Mayes, Goosen, and several other South African participants were also interviewed at length for this article.

The FBI and CIA, which were jointly involved in the encounter with Goosen, declined to speak about it on the record. However, U.S. government officials, who asked not to be identified by name, have provided details of the negotiations. They say the agencies were troubled by Goosen's claims but suspected the scientist and his partners were more interested in cashing in than helping out. They viewed Goosen and his partners as naive, at best, for expecting to be rewarded for turning over what they viewed as 1990s-vintage biological material -- products that could be duplicated in any well-equipped, modern microbiology lab.

"If they thought we were going to put out good money for that kind of stuff, they came to the wrong group," said one U.S. law-enforcement official who reviewed Goosen's proposal. "Thanks for being good citizens, but no thanks."

Goosen acknowledged that he had hoped to benefit financially, and sought permission to work in the United States, where he wanted to start a new business. But he says the FBI misjudged both his intentions and his ability to help them defend against future bioterrorism.

"At minimum, they should have copies and DNA fingerprints for each of the strains from Project Coast," he said. "If one of the strains were to turn up in Iraq, at least they would know where it came from."

Goosen, an affable 51-year-old who became a veterinarian like his father, was picked in 1981 as the founding director of Roodeplaat Research Laboratories, the bioweapons research arm of Project Coast.

Project Coast's notorious military commander, Wouter Basson, used the lab to create novel weapons for use against anti-apartheid activists and the black communities that supported them, according to documents and testimony in a murder and fraud case that ended last year in Basson's acquittal. One of Goosen's first assignments, he has said, was to harvest highly lethal venom from the black mambo snake for use in secret assassinations. Fangs from a dead snake were used to make impressions in the victim's skin so the death would appear accidental.

A widening rift between Goosen and Basson over the lab's direction ended with Goosen's resignation in 1986. But he continued to work as a consultant for the lab and maintained close ties with its scientists, some of whom would later work for him in his private laboratory. After Project Coast was disbanded, Goosen was among the first scientists to publicly acknowledge and condemn its offensive weapons research.

South African officials claimed to have destroyed all of Project Coast's biological materials in 1993, several months before the outgoing government of Frederik W. de Klerk revealed the secret program to Nelson Mandela, the first president of post-apartheid South Africa. But Goosen says many scientists kept copies of organisms and documents in order to continue work on "dual-use" projects with commercial as well as military applications. Goosen's vaccine production lab, ended up with hundreds of strains, at least half of which were from Project Coast. At his home in Pretoria, he showed a visiting reporter two trays of what he described as vaccine strains that he kept in a freezer.

"The products should have been destroyed. The products were not destroyed," he said.

After the U.S. anthrax attack in October 2001, at the urging of American friends, Goosen approached the U.S. Department of Defense with an offer of "open cooperation" in sharing Project Coast's extensive research in anthrax vaccines and novel antidotes known as antiserums. The Pentagon was sufficiently interested to arrange a meeting in January 2002 between Goosen and Bioport Corp., the Michigan company that produces anthrax vaccines for the military. But interest from the U.S. side evaporated quickly, to Goosen's amazement.

"At that time there was a massive amount of good will toward the United States, and a feeling that we could contribute," Goosen said. "My thinking was: If George Bush had contracted anthrax, our technology could have cured him."
Clandestine Deals

The two men who finally brought Goosen to the FBI's attention knew little of germ warfare but were old hands in the shadowy world of arms trading and secret deals. Goosen had met neither until May 4, 2002, just two days before the toothpaste tube filled with genetically-altered bacteria began the journey across the Atlantic.

One of the men, retired South African Maj. Gen. Tai Minnaar, was a former military intelligence officer who had worked undercover for the CIA in Cuba in the 1970s, according to his resume. After Goosen's unsuccessful meeting with Bioport, Minnaar phoned Goosen, offering to put him in touch with U.S. officials who would appreciate the value of his work. And, Minnaar said, the Americans might be willing to pay money -- perhaps tens of millions of dollars, Goosen recalled.

Minnaar's first call was to Mayes, the former CIA operative, whom he had met and befriended during Mayes' frequent business trips to South Africa in the 1980s and 1990s. On March 4, Minnaar wrote to Mayes warning that dangerous biological material from Project Coast still existed in South Africa and posed unacceptable risks.

"With the current situation here at present, we need to ensure that the technology as well as 'stock in hand' (at present stored safely in a private facility) are safeguarded from finding its way to the people on the wrong side of the fence," Minnaar wrote in an e-mail to Mayes. "This is a very real danger, as some of the other technology we fear has already been sold."

Mayes, 64, a missiles expert who had built a career out of making clandestine deals to acquire foreign-built weapons and air-defense systems for the CIA, said he became quickly convinced that Minnaar was right. Within three weeks, he arranged the first of a series of meetings with FBI and CIA officials to discuss the feasibility of bringing Goosen and his bacterial collection to the United States.

Mayes said that he sought "not a penny" of compensation for himself because "it didn't seem like the patriotic thing to do." Mayes acknowledged he was hoping to shore up his reputation with the U.S. intelligence community following a series of highly publicized legal troubles in the late 1990s. Mayes had been investigated for alleged offenses ranging from the mishandling of classified documents to violating export regulations. Two separate grand juries found no evidence that Mayes had broken the law. His ex-wife made the allegations during a difficult divorce.

To remove the bacterial strains from South Africa, Mayes and an associate, Robert Zlockie, a former CIA officer, drew up an extraction plan in the event an agreement was reached to sell the pathogens to the United States.

A private aircraft would land at a remote airfield 600 miles from coastal city of Durban. From a waiting camper-trailer on the runway, the bacteria in two cryogenic canisters would be loaded onto the plane along with two of the South African scientists. The canisters were to be labeled "oxygen" to avoid suspicion. One of the canisters was to contain more than 20 liters of antiserum and other antidotes, documents show. The other would contain 200 glass vials of biological material described as "extremely harmful to people and the environment." An inventory later provided to the FBI listed the contents of those vials as more than 150 strains of bacteria, including six that were marked as "genetically modified."

Before the large transfer of pathogens could be made, Goosen first sent a sample to the FBI, which they insistently sought. It was meant to ice the deal and dispel any doubts about Goosen's credentials. Goosen recalled that he thought carefully before selecting a strain and settled on "Escherichia coli 078:K80 (+K60 GM)," a common intestinal bacterium that had been spliced with a toxin-producing gene from Clostridium perfringens. C. perfringens causes several potentially fatal conditions including gas gangrene, a rare and severe form of gangrene in which in bacteria aggressively attack living tissue.

Biodefense experts have long worried about the implications of genetic modification for biological warfare or terrorism. The kind of engineering accomplished by Project Coast could theoretically be used to transfer lethal properties to ordinary bacteria. Or, conversely, it could be used to inoculate people and animals against disease.

The problem of how to transport the sample to the United States was quickly solved by Goosen himself. Microbes can easily be transported, he said, in sealed glass cylinder inserted inside an ordinary toothpaste tube. A few grams of cooling gel squirted into the tube would ensure a stable temperature for a trips of up to several days.

"I can take it all over the world," Mayes quoted the scientist as saying.
Offer Declined

At 5p.m. on May 9, 2002, Robert Zlockie, the retired CIA officer who had couriered the toothpaste tube across the Atlantic, delivered the package to an agent at the FBI's office in Key West, Fla. In return, he was given a hand-written receipt on FBI letterhead. "One toothpaste tube containing one ampul of E. coli genetically coded with epsilon toxin," it read.

Within days, the bacteria arrived at the Army's top biodefense laboratory at Fort Detrick, Md. for scientific analysis. Government biodefense scientists were consulted about the findings, and helped the FBI in assessing the implications. By May 15, the FBI arrived at several conclusions, according to officials who participated in the discussion.

They decided that Goosen's altered bacteria was precisely as the scientist had described it and that the pathogens listed in his collection were likely "legacy" materials from Project Coast, just as Goosen claimed. They also decided that the FBI would not offer a penny for any of it.

"The material was just as advertised, but the hands-down reaction was, 'So what?' " said one law-enforcement official familiar with the assessment.

U.S. officials involved in the decision say they saw no compelling reasons for paying Goosen or for excluding the government of South Africa, a U.S. ally, from an operation affecting the security of biological material in that country. Mayes, in an urgent note to the FBI, pleaded against alerting South African authorities, saying the scientists "have no faith that the material would ever reach" the United States government. But within days of the note, the FBI reported the matter to South Africa in an official letter relayed through the U.S. Embassy in Pretoria. "From that point on, it became a police matter for South Africa," the law enforcement official said.

The FBI also was not convinced that buying Goosen's vials would make Americans safer, the official said. Deadly anthrax and c. perfringens can be found in nature, the official noted. And, while Project Coast's experiments in genetic engineering were state-of-the-art at the time, technology had advanced so rapidly that similar kinds of genetic alterations are now performed by microbiology students "at the graduate or even undergraduate level," the official said.

Other biological weapons experts have criticized the FBI's decision, saying the agency missed the point. While genetic engineering has become increasingly common, there are few known instances where scientists have deliberately tried to adapt organisms for germ warfare. Soviet bioweapons scientists were beginning to produce genetically altered prototypes when their program was shut down in 1992, according Ken Alibek, a former Soviet scientist who defected to the United States.

Back in Pretoria, Goosen heard not a word from the United States after sending his toothpaste tube. But he assumed the deal was off when local authorities obtained a warrant to search his laboratory. Nothing was confiscated, said Goosen, who has never been charged with a crime.

The experience left Goosen embittered and disillusioned, but otherwise little has changed in his circumstances -- except that more people are aware of his bacteria collection and are inquiring about it. In the past nine months, the scientist has been offered money by a German treasure-hunter and a man claiming to be an Arab sheik. Goosen says he turned the offers down, but worries about future bioterrorism.

"A small container of pathogens could kill a million people," he said. "It's hard enough to secure fissile materials, which are large and easy to detect. How do you begin to control a substance that looks like nothing more than sugar?"

Bale, the Monterey Institute researcher, believes U.S. officials should have jumped at the opportunity to secure the South African strains. "Here was a guy who had worked in a former chemical and biological program and was willing to provide information and assistance to the United States," Bale said. "That's worth following up on. If a person like Goosen decides to collaborate with a foreign party, it's far better that he collaborates with us and not with rogue elements in other parts of the world."

Washington Post staff writer Joby Warrick will answer reader questions about this series in a video interview Monday. Submit questions for Warrick at www.washingtonpost.com.

© 2003 The Washington Post Company

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Apr19.html

NOW, YOU KNOW SOUTH AFRICA HAS A STERLING RECORD REGARDING THEIR TREATMENT OF GOLD & DIAMOND MINERS AND WOULD NEVER CONSIDER THINGS THAT GO AGAINST THE GRAIN WHEN IT COMES TO INTERNATIONAL LAW OR HUMAN RIGHTS STANDARDS SUCH AS APARTHEID OR FLAMING USED TIRE NECKLACES....right?

THE U.S. HAS ITS FORT DETRICK IN MARYLAND, RUN FOR MANY YEARS BY WILLIAM CAPERS PATRICK III, AND THE U.K. HAS A PLACE WHICH I THINK IS CALLED PORTON DOWNS...

WHAT DOES CANADA HAVE?
User avatar
J.B. Stone
 
Posts: 47720
Joined: 04/ 11/ 03 10:01 am
Location: Northwest Montana

Next

Return to Bio-Chemical Warfare and You

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests