The time now is 09/ 02/ 10 3:37 pm 
Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum Index
Home  ∴ Forum  ∴ Recent  ∴ Register  ∴ Profile ∴  Log in to check your private messages ∴  Log in
FAQ  ∴ Search  ∴ Donate ∴  Activist's Toolbox ∴  FD Links ∴  FD Swag  

[ Login to join chat ]  FD Arcade - Click Here-->    
   

Warman's Latest Trick
Edward Kennedy
C2C Journal
 Cadman can kiss my ass... Post new topic    Reply to topic
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next Page 3 of 4
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Jump to:  

 

 Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum IndexGeneral News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Offlinepinetree
Joined: 26 Sep 2003
Total posts: 1797
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 05/ 19/ 05 6:59 am    Post subject: Cadman can kill my a-- Reply with quote

khori_wan_kenobi wrote:
Quote:
I hear that Global news paid for a poll within Cadmans constituance and the answer was a vote for the budget. If he is following their wishes I say let him. That's what we elect these people for to represent us.


I disagree, sometimes an MP must vote according to what is right.For example, I'm sure if he polled his riding the majority would say that they want a $50 per hour minimum wage, or that they disagree with a 40 hour work week etc.

Poll results aren't always logical.


I agree Khori - totally. When I ran for the School Board, I made it so clear what I stood for, what I believed and what I was going to try to do while in office that I got a mandate from the voters to USE MY OWN BEST JUDGEMENT IN EVERY SITUATION. If they didn't like it, they could throw me out next time. I'm happy to say it was quite successful both at the table, in the press and with my constituents. Speaking out in plain English (I also ran a weekly column in all the local newspapers) encouraged the voters to contact me directly and they certainly DID. If they liked the stand I was taking, they flocked at the Board to support me. If they didn't like it, I got rude telephone calls but that was about all.

Cadman has illustrated the one great weakness in the Reform idea of grass roots rule.

Instead of telling them where HE stands with his known mandate, insider information and getting their reaction, he's waiting for THEM to tell him what to do. He has 20,000 voters and he polls 600 with a leading, irrelevant question - do you want an election?

As a 'Reformer' he's nothing but a polling company! I have no respect for him or that philosophy whatever! He might as well spend his entire term in his living room. Why bother to go to Ottawa at ALL!

(ps. Can anybody change this very offensive thread title?)[/b]
_________________
"WE'RE ALL CONSERVATIVES"
Back to top
View user's profile 
Sponsor
Use PayPal to make regular monthly $20 donations to the free speech cause - quit any time! Or make a one time donation!
OfflineAngleland
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Total posts: 5447
Location: Ireland
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 05/ 19/ 05 7:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

While Mr. Cadman's support of the Liberals is disappointing, the CPC leadership can look at itself in their mirror for the blame here. Chuck was done out of the CPC nomination by a very dubious process. The guy who won the thing got creamed in the election. The CPC leadership sat on its colective brain and did bupkis about that nomination farce and thus threw away one electoral district.
Furthermore, I supported Mr. Harper and still do, but did he make any personal approaches to bring Chuck back into the CPC? I hear that Martin personally visted Mr. Cadman. Politics is personal. Martin is a slimeball but he understands that fact. If Harper visited Chuck, I appolgize to him right now, if not, why not?
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineYoung Tory
Avatar

Joined: 01 Nov 2004
Total posts: 2329
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 05/ 19/ 05 7:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Angleland wrote:
While Mr. Cadman's support of the Liberals is disappointing, the CPC leadership can look at itself in their mirror for the blame here. Chuck was done out of the CPC nomination by a very dubious process. The guy who won the thing got creamed in the election. The CPC leadership sat on its colective brain and did bupkis about that nomination farce and thus threw away one electoral district.
Furthermore, I supported Mr. Harper and still do, but did he make any personal approaches to bring Chuck back into the CPC? I hear that Martin personally visted Mr. Cadman. Politics is personal. Martin is a slimeball but he understands that fact. If Harper visited Chuck, I appolgize to him right now, if not, why not?


I heard that the Conservatives have left the nomination open for him to take.
_________________
"A nation that kills its own children has no future."- Pope John Paul II (1920-2005)

"Liberals watch more tv and eat more bon bons too. They have more time for these activities between their protests. Conservatives are busy working to pay taxes so liberals can enjoy that kind of life." -texasredtop
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineMuddy
Avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Total posts: 7285
Location: Halton Hills
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 05/ 19/ 05 7:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like Chuck. I have spent time with him. a straight up guy and calls it as he sees it. I too am disappointed that he may vote for the Libs budget. But he thinks it is the right thing to do for his constituents or he wouldn`t do it. I truely believe you couldn`t buy this guy.
_________________
Dislexics of the world ..........Untie!!
You see ,there is no dog !
Surveys say 10 out of every 2 people are afflicted!
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail 
Nemo2
Avatar

Location: Ottawa
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 05/ 19/ 05 7:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Things are not always what they seem............it's conceivable that the CPC don't want the government to fall at this time, and that having Mr Cadman support the Liberals on this one issue would achieve that aim whilst maintaining the pretense that they hoped a non-confidence motion would pass.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your
philosophy". Hamlet
_________________
Exit, pursued by a bear.
William Shakespeare, Stage direction in "The Winter's Tale"
Back to top
View user's profile 
Offlinesideline28
Joined: 19 May 2005
Total posts: 6
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 05/ 19/ 05 7:35 am    Post subject: Cadman's not our last chance.... Reply with quote

It's Stephen Harper. He's the one who MUST convince Cadman to vote with against the Liberals. If he can't do that after all the stuff that's gone down, then he might as well resign.

SL28
Back to top
View user's profile 
Enn
Location: Ottawa
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 05/ 19/ 05 7:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In my letter to Chuck Cadman, I reminded him of a few facts when considering the polls that say the majority in his riding don't want an election:

1. 40% of Canadians didn't bother to vote last election, so if polled, they will say they don't want an election. What they want is irrelevant since they relinquished their stake in the matter

2. any Liberal doesn't want an election - they're afraid of the being punished for corruption, and they want the pork budget passed

3. any NDP doesn't want an election - they want their $4.6 billion government bribe to pass

4. is the role of an independent MP merely to represent the majoirty of the riding's opinion on any given day, especially given the above?

5. The Saturday May 14 Ottawa Citizen reported on a just released Ipsos Reid poll that "half of Canadians now believe the government has lost the confidence of Parliament and should call an "immediate" election."


_________________
Happiness is that state of consciousness which proceeds from the achievement of one's values. Ayn Rand
Back to top
View user's profile 
Offlineshiva
Joined: 13 Oct 2003
Total posts: 4416
Gender: Female

PostPosted: 05/ 19/ 05 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know much about Cadman but what I do know, I like. He seems like an honourable, honest guy. I like the fact that he comes to politics through a very non-traditional route, he doesn't fit people's typical perception of what a conservative is and his reasons for entering politics are the kind that come with convictions that nobody on earth, can shake. The loss of a child, especially under the circumstances, would bring a resolve and determination that no Liberal money man could shake. Having said that, I think he is not thinking clearly on this issue. While I agree with the principle of doing as your constituents would have you do, this is not a time to follow, it is a time to LEAD. No doubt, battling illness right now does not help. I can't imagine the level of physical stress and emotional stress he may be under right now. I would like to think though, that if I were in his position, and I wished to know what my constituents thought, I would take the time to inform them of all the issues to consider before responding to a poll question. I think I would make sure that they understood that this is a real turning point in how we do politics in this country. The credibility of our entire political system is at stake right now. I would let them know that my closeness to the political goings on in Ottawa allow me to see something most people, unless they follow politics everyday, are not aware of and I would try to convey to them the seriousness of the situation. Then, I would not ask whether they wish to have an election at this time, I would ask whether there should be an election at this time.

Even then, I have to say in this situation, as others have noted, there are very compelling reasons to do what he thinks is right and then explain his position. Like I said, it is a time for leaders to speak with conviction and do what is right for all of Canada. This is an issue of national consequence, and bigger than the individual constituents in Cadman's or Belinda's riding, for that matter.
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineLionhead
Avatar

Joined: 01 Nov 2004
Total posts: 4434
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 05/ 19/ 05 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

khori_wan_kenobi wrote:
I disagree, sometimes an MP must vote according to what is right.

I agree. However, independent MP's tend to vote more according to their constituents' wishes.

Cadman can go against them two ways. If his constituents favour the budget and Cadman knows full well that it's a bad one for the country, he could vote against it.

If his constituents also favour it simply because they don't want another election right now, he can go against them in this instance as well.

It's up to him.

I've just heard Kilgour is voting against the government, so it's REALLY going to rest with Chuck now.
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineChocolate Tennis Balls
Joined: 16 Apr 2005
Total posts: 2220
Location: Niagara Falls
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 05/ 19/ 05 5:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with Nemo2. Now that Belinda has taken all the CPC's secret election strategies over to the Libranos, it's quite likely that the CPC's don't want an election after all, but they have to maintain the illusion that they do want the government to fall.
_________________
The goal of socialism is communism. - Lenin.
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineMangioninc
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Total posts: 1008
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 05/ 19/ 05 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

He COULD always vote for the budget and against the Jack-Paul one night stand, could he not?
_________________
If you hate Canada, vote Liberal
Progressiveness is just a buzz-word for incompetence.
Toronto: "Incompetence isn''t just our motto, it''s our way of life!"
Back to top
View user's profile 
Offlinedramaperson
Joined: 09 Apr 2004
Total posts: 667
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 05/ 19/ 05 5:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whiggamore wrote:
He represents Wallytown baby. Those people shouldn't even be allowed to live, let alone vote.

.


I find this statement to be utterly repugnant especially from some kid who obviously has no idea of what Chuck Cadman and his Whalley constituents have fought through and Chuck is still fighting through.

Chuck Cadman has a form of cancer which in most cases is a death sentence and for your information Chuck may not have a future at all to enjoy all of those Goodies being suggested by some of you here such as ambassadorships from the power hungry Martinites.

Chuck's constituents came out by the thousands to support his Nomination which had been stolen from him by an unethical group who stooped to the level of bussing in hundreds of non-residents of Chuck's riding.

Chuck, as an Independent, WON the riding because of his constituent's support and in fact the Conservative party then withdrew his membership from the party.

Chuck's constituents went to the wall to ensure Chuck won his riding because of his care and support FOR his constituents so now you all would impugn Chuck's character because Chuck is choosing to do what his constituents want him to do?

Of course this kind of integrity and honesty appears not to be the case in the crap being shovelled against Chuck Cadman by a few here.

FYI I am not a member of Chuck's riding but I know and respect Chuck Cadman for his honesty and his loyalty to his constituents.

CPC
Back to top
View user's profile 
HeywoodFloyd
Gender: Unknown

PostPosted: 05/ 19/ 05 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Craig Oliver is reporting that Cadman has told Harper that he will vote with the government.
_________________
"You secular-progressive pinko" - Unnamed FD Poster.
Back to top
View user's profile 
OfflineJadeScorpion
Avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2004
Total posts: 1933
Location: Ontario
Gender: Female

PostPosted: 05/ 19/ 05 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I was furious when I saw Mr. Cadman stand up in favour of the budget.

But when he came on camera and explained why he voted yes, he was very direct, honest and eloquent.

I like this guy. Too bad he has to sit as an independant and was not offered a "plum position" like the one offered to Belinda by the Lieberals.

I think the Conservatives came at him at the 11th hr but it was too late to strike a deal then.

Mr. Cadman did the right thing and honoured the wishes of his constituents.

Seeing this type of honesty is refreshing at this point in time, when all we seem to get are details of sleazy deals and sleazier politicians i.e. the Gomery report and Belinda Stronach!
_________________
~To you he's a dog. To me, he's an adopted child who is short, hairy, walks on all fours and doesn't speak clearly. I have no problem with any of these things!~
Back to top
View user's profile 
Knave
Avatar

Location: Calgary, Alberta
Gender: Male

PostPosted: 05/ 20/ 05 3:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

styky wrote:

Let me spell it out for you then....many here have children hovering around us that we do not wish to have exposed to the language.


styky, I was being sarcastic.... and trying to have a sense of humor. Lighten up... Smile

And while I know not all of us are childless, I also feel like the people directly involved in this forum - and reading all the posts thuroughly - are all adults. Yeah, okay, there might be kids wandering around - but, reading every word on the screen? Don't know.... but I'll leave that up to the experts - that is, those that have kids.


Quote:
Connie and Mark have always taken great pride and satisfaction in having a site that is not filled with explicit language and as this is their baby I say we respect that by toneing it down and watching our language.
Not talking


I agree wholeheartedly.

But, if that can't be done, at least be kind enough to use the * key to censor or soften those words you do use. I think we can all figure out what "f***" means without my having to spell it out.....

Hrm?
_________________
"If Ottawa giveth, then Ottawa can taketh away… This is o­ne more reason why Westerners, but Albertans in particular, need to think hard about their future in this country."

Stephen Harper, in a letter to the National Post, December 8 2000
Back to top
View user's profile 
Sponsor
Use PayPal to make regular monthly $20 donations to the free speech cause - quit any time! Or make a one time donation!
Display posts from previous:   
 Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs Forum IndexGeneral News


 

 Cadman can kiss my ass... Post new topic    Reply to topic
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next Page 3 of 4
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 
  Home ∴  Forum ∴  Recent ∴  FAQ  ∴ Search  ∴ Register  ∴ Profile ∴  Log in to check your private messages ∴  Log in



Free Dominion - Principled Conservative - Party and Canadian Politics - Canada Blogs topic RSS feed 
Google Sitemap Generator
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group