OTTAWA -- The Conservative party required newly elected MPs to sign on to a partisan database that some privacy experts believe breaches constituent privacy, if not the law.
The Tories deny the private constituency work files of any MPs ever went into the party database -- known as the Constituent Information Management System (CIMS) -- and a government minister insists it has nothing to do with government work.
But a party authorization form for MPs clearly shows the system was geared to political operations and was intended for use in the Parliament Hill and constituency offices of Tory MPs.
Former Conservative Garth Turner, now a Liberal MP, signed the form in February 2006. He said his constituency office staff was told by the party to use CIMS as "our daily databank" -- and did so for several months last year.
A party spokesperson insisted yesterday that no information from constituent files is ever entered in the party database.
"If Garth can produce the information that confirms that, I'd love to take a look at it . . . the party does not use MP case work in CIMS," said Ryan Sparrow.
Late yesterday afternoon, Turner produced the CIMS user identification (MP/Hill) authorization form he was required to sign.
The form states that it "must be completed and then faxed or mailed to the Conservative Party of Canada political operations office." The form lists three possible access locations: Parliament Hill office, constituency office, or other.
In the Commons yesterday, Turner demanded to know whether Canadians can see their CIMS files or have them removed.
Peter Van Loan, the Conservative House leader, responded: "I fail to see what a political party database has to do with government business."
While flatly stating that no constituency files are used in the partisan database, the Conservatives claimed that Turner himself was guilty of that very transgression.
http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/News/Nation ... 3-sun.html


